Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Alberta Election

  1. #1
    Becoming a C2E Power Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006

    Default Alberta Election

    An Alberta General Election is expected in the next fifteen months, most probably in early 2012. Popular wisdom and the mass media say that Ed Stelmach’s Progressive Conservative government is in trouble, having fumbled the ball on various policy issues, from medicare, through the Monty Python-like oil and gas royalty review, to poor oversight of oil sands’ phasing and their environmental impact. Their story line is that the Wildrose Alliance Party (WAP) is running even with the PCs in public opinion polls and could form the next government. But a recent opinion poll commissioned by the Democratic Renewal Project (DRP) tells an entirely different story.

    Other opposition parties – the Greens (Vision 2012), Liberals and New Democrats - also sense the window of opportunity and make brave statements about their potential, because the conservative or right-wing vote will be split between the two front-runners. Their problem is, however, that the longstanding split of the “progressive” vote among the three parties will be exacerbated by the addition of the Alberta Party to the field. Wishful thinking aside, are these four parties making any headway?
    The DRP – a grassroots organization of Albertans from all parties devoted to replacing the present government with a progressive alternative – recently hired Leger Marketing to do a public opinion poll on Albertans’ provincial party preferences. Leger found some surprising results. In a telephone survey of 891 eligible voter respondents, Albertans broke out as follows: PC 26%, Undecided 25%, Liberal 14%, WAP 13%, New Democrat 6%, Green Party 4%, Alberta Party 1%, Other 1%. (“Will Not Vote” and “Refuse to Answer” made up the rest.) Among DECIDED voters, support levels were: PC 39%, Liberal 21%, WAP 20%, New Democrat 10%, Green Party 7%, Alberta Party 2%, Other 1%.

    According to this poll, not only is WAP’s support way below the Conservatives, but a hair less than the Liberals’! Furthermore, the potential combined progressive vote equals that of the leading Conservatives. What gives?

    Several explanations for these dramatically different results are possible. First, maybe polls are not reliable – as John Diefenbaker once punned, “polls” are of interest only to dogs. Second, WAP’s support may originally have been higher because people parked their votes there when initially moving away from the Conservatives. Now they are willing to look at some other possibilities. Third, the initial surge of enthusiasm for the new “true” conservative WAP has faded as people realize that the old mantra that “that government is best which governs least” is obsolete. Fourth, the results do not appear to capture the increased interest in the Alberta Party, which as the enthusiastic new kid on the block, is gaining support daily.
    The strength of the potential progressive vote should not be a surprise. In the 2008 election, the combined vote for the Green, Liberal and New Democratic Parties exceeded that for the Conservatives in twelve constituencies where the latter won. It was almost as high in several others. In fact, the strong Conservative win (72 of 83 seats) was accomplished with only 52.6% of the total votes cast. 47.4% -- close to half – did not vote for the Conservatives last time round. Many Albertans would agree that electoral reform is needed – probably some version of Proportional Representation. Of course the present government has no interest in this as it benefits from our dysfunctional first-past-the-post system.

    But more relevant for the results of this survey is that only 41% of eligible Albertans voted in the last election. We don’t know how non-voters would have exercised their franchise but surely a significant reason for not voting was that there was no point – we always get the same result anyway. DRP wants to change that. DRP first tried to get the centre-left parties to negotiate a “non-compete” agreement and allocate exclusive candidacies to whichever of them has the best chance to win in promising constituencies. Such a combination could eventually – if not in 2012 then next time – take over government and implement PR.

    This non-compete idea did not gain much support (only the Liberals showed any interest), so the DRP has moved to “Plan B”. It will endorse the strongest progressive candidate, regardless of party, and recommend strategic voting for that person. It plans to offer constituency-by -constituency analyzes and endorsements. The Leger poll suggests that such an approach could be fruitful and give discouraged voters on the centre-left reason to return to polling booths in 2012.

    Almost certainly, 2011 will be a volatile year in Alberta politics. Remembering Calgary Centre’s strategic voting in the 2000 federal election for PC Joe Clark in an “Anybody but the Alliance” surge, similar decisions by voters in the coming Alberta election may surprise both the Conservatives and WAP. Mayor Naheed Nenshi’s win in Calgary shows that intelligent, thoughtful politics can succeed in Alberta. It can’t come to the provincial level too soon.

    -- Phil Elder, Calgary Co-chair of the DRP

  2. #2


    All I can say, having lived under FPP and PR, is thank god we aren't going to get PR anytime soon. The problem is not the system (one that has contributed to Canada and Alberta being one of the most wealthy countries/provinces on earth), it is the politicians. Changing the systems won't change the politicians. Just because you don't like the party in power, isn't a reason to change the rules.

  3. #3


    I don't believe the WRA has as much power as they say they do.

  4. #4


    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    I don't believe the WRA has as much power as they say they do.

    All they have is a leader that talks and talks and then talks some more.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts