Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: 24 New Tram Stations in Paris

  1. #1

    Default 24 New Tram Stations in Paris

    Can you imagine an American city completing capital improvements to three different mass transit lines in one month? That's what's just happened in Paris, after a breakneck month of opening extensions on the T1, T2 and T3 tramway lines.

    The latest is the new segment of Paris' orbital T3 tram line, which opened on Saturday, adding 24 stations along 14.5 kilometers of track to the existing line that runs on the city's southern edge. The latest addition has direct connections with the city's Metro system in four locations.

    The new stretch, which encircles the eastern half of the city and ends at Porte de la Chapelle, will be able to handle 165,000 passengers a day. Rapid transport between outlying Parisian districts will no longer require a trip into the center.

    The T3 extension was completed right on time, opening six years to the day after the first section of the line.
    http://www.theatlanticcities.com/com...ns-paris/4169/
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  2. #2
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    6,418

    Default

    Can you maybe make one all-encompassing thread for LRT developments in far-away cities?

  3. #3

    Default

    That's a good idea
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  4. #4

    Default

    I wish we had this level of commitment to public transit however.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  5. #5
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    6,418

    Default

    So I'm trying to wrap my head around this project...and from the article it almost seems like they built a much smaller, LRT version of one of the legs of the Henday. (probably considerably cheaper too)

    Does that sound right? They talked about people in outlying areas being able to take this route around the city instead of going to through the core.

  6. #6

    Default

    When all 7 or 8 tram lines are built it will look like this...



    the henday wouldn't be an apt comparison.. more like the whitemud, 75st, yellowhead
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 20-12-2012 at 03:55 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  7. #7

    Default

    This is ontop of Paris's new state of the are super metro... that is currently under construction...

    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  8. #8

    Default

    the current metro system is pretty much confined to old paris which is that small little area in the middle. and the perferie or the ring road follows the walls that used to fortify the city.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  9. #9

    Default



    here is a map of the existing...
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  10. #10

    Default

    ^ all of that is in a space only a few km wide.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex.L View Post
    So I'm trying to wrap my head around this project...and from the article it almost seems like they built a much smaller, LRT version of one of the legs of the Henday. (probably considerably cheaper too)

    Does that sound right? They talked about people in outlying areas being able to take this route around the city instead of going to through the core.
    ooo and to futher add to that before the trams and the new subway people had to take commuter rail into paris to access the metro. ( if we make a high level generalization)
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  12. #12

    Default

    here is a map of only the commuter rail systems...



    http://parisbytrain.com/files/2008/05/rer.pdf

    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  13. #13

    Default

    I hope that all makes sense...

    Paris has the Metro, The super Metro (under construction) Commuter Rail and the Trams. servicing a population of about 11 million. 55-60% of Paris lives car free. I am trying to find the numbers for Paris proper but it's something like 95% live car free....

    The suburbs are 45% car free..
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 20-12-2012 at 04:34 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  14. #14

    Default

    Maybe one could add in the population density of Paris, and of France, and compare that to Edmonton and Alberta.

  15. #15

    Default

    I can't find up to date info on car ownership in Paris so we can just run with 55-60% live car free

    so in short that is what it take to get 50-60% of your population out of thier car... so thinking that one line being grade separated at a couple of intersections is going to achieve a mass migration out of the car is just silly.. thinking that shaving 10 min of the travel time of one line is going to make people flee to mass transit is just as silly...

    Paris is the face of real public transport and they are selling their know how across the world.. part of it landed in Edmonton. The P3 contract for ottawa went to one of the international transit and rail leaders who are based out of... you guessed it France/Paris.

    http://www.veoliatransportation.com/index

    they will likely end up running out line too.
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 20-12-2012 at 05:55 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  16. #16
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    City of Champions
    Posts
    7,235

    Default

    Paris can have very few cars for a few reasons, because France has an area (260,000 sq mil) almost the same as Alberta (255,000 sq mi), and population of 65 millions versus the 3.6 million here they have a density of 301 people/sq mile versus our 14.7 people/sq mile. Note Edmonton itself has a metro density of 319 people/sq mile.
    So because they have roughly 20x the density they can support a very good train network of TGVs, excellent commuter rail and subways. You don't need a car to get to most places in France you can take a trains almost everywhere you want to go.

    Unfortunately without the density Alberta will not achieve this level of train usage.

  17. #17

    Default

    In the 50's Paris had a plan to run freeways all over the place and destroy alter some amazing public spaces and give them over to the car....

    France/Paris choose a different route they TRULEY embraced public transport and continued to build their suburbs in a manor where 45% of the people live car free. I lived in France for a summer and traveled From Paris to Le Man and the Le louire valley. There is lots of room in France and some amazing hiways but they value a different lifestyle nor to they view not owning a car as a social detriment.... one of the questions on a very well used dating site it "do you own a car" I can tell you that people have declined to go out on a date with me because I don't own a car and most of my work mates "don't know how I do it!"

    Paris can have very few cars because they left the pre car transportation network in place, expanded it and have continued to design their cities and suburbs around people and efficient modes of transportation.

    Again I point out that if you layer all the maps on top of each other that is the public transport system that is needed to achieve a car free percentage of apx 60%... but not only will we have to put the transport system in place but we also need to change the city and we can bet on the fact that the number one thing that shapes a city is it's transportation systems.
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 21-12-2012 at 11:57 AM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  18. #18

    Default

    Of course you'll ignore the fact that Paris, and France have population density many times higher than Edmonton and Alberta... This higher density allowed for the rail network to be built up... but you'll continue to ignore these facts, and slight Edmonton passively without little consideration outside of your usual line of thinking "car bad, europe good" You could fit most of Europe within the 3 prairie provinces and BC. Alberta is as a large as France. 3.5 M to 70 M?

  19. #19

    Default

    Here is what designing our city solely around the car looks like...

    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  20. #20

    Default

    please tell us what you think is so wrong with the above picture, and perhaps you could tell us where the picture is from.

    (I don't expect you to do this, because you like to play "out of context" game, and can't seem to apply reasoning to any of your thought processes)

  21. #21

    Default


    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  22. #22

    Default

    ^ I am so excited to have this in Edmonton... the fisr video atound 2 min give ya some good shots of speed.

    Its great to watch the signaling too.. how quickly the signals change.. it really puts into perspective how outdate out signal arms and heavry rail design of our old system is way behind the times.
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 21-12-2012 at 03:31 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  23. #23

    Default

    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medwards View Post
    please tell us what you think is so wrong with the above picture, and perhaps you could tell us where the picture is from.

    (I don't expect you to do this, because you like to play "out of context" game, and can't seem to apply reasoning to any of your thought processes)
    Oh, you will have to wait for the sequel to find that out. I should imagine it will be in one of his new threads. Maybe 50 Shades of Tram, Trams R Us, Tramsformers, Trams and their Pets, Tram Apparel or Lady and the Tram(p).
    Their is also a possibility of a thread called Trams vs LRT Systems of the World.
    That one I wait with baited breath for.
    "The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read." ĖMark Twain

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    ^ I am so excited to have this in Edmonton...
    Yes, we understand that you are giddy with excitement.

    Your comparisons between Paris and Edmonton are really over the top. In order to make Edmonton with the same density, you would have to pack the entire population in an area between Groat Road and WGD/75th - Whyte Ave. and 118th Ave. Heck, Paris has 20,000 people living in a area the size of South Edmonton Common! Sure a lot easier to make transit systems cost/benefit ratio work to Paris's favor.

    Pretty easy to have a walk-able, bike-able, transit oriented city where every need is close at hand and the average low in January is +2.5C

    If you really want to create a "Paris" of the North, you have to do some "reorganization" like they did in Paris or Dresden.


    Nice steetcar
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  26. #26
    Partially Addicted to C2E
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    There is lots of room in France and some amazing hiways but they value a different lifestyle nor to they view not owning a car as a social detriment.... one of the questions on a very well used dating site it "do you own a car" I can tell you that people have declined to go out on a date with me because I don't own a car and most of my work mates "don't know how I do it!"
    Even in Toronto, Montreal and other transit-oriented North American cities there is very little stigma associated with not owning a car. I have a friend in Portland who makes six figures and yet got rid of his car. My point is, we don't have to become like Paris, but just need to increase our density and improve transit incrementally to achieve significant gains in this area.

  27. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    WOW, that picture looks familiar!




    Yes it looks like...



    wait for it...




    wait for it...



    ...a street car named Desire!




    Hey, EDP, take a ride on the oldest streetcar system in North America, in operation since 1835!

    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  28. #28

    Default

    PRT...I never compared Paris to Edmonton... Paris is an example of a society that has reduced car ownership to some of the lowest levels in a developed nation. Why do you get so defensive about looking at others successes and adapting and applying that here...

    Better yet why not recognize that Paris and the people who design/run it are selling their knowledge and know how globally. Not only that Paris has embraced public transport... look at what they are building! it's pretty awesome. There is nothing wrong in emulating that attitude.
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 21-12-2012 at 05:43 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  29. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PrairieBoyinExile View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    There is lots of room in France and some amazing hiways but they value a different lifestyle nor to they view not owning a car as a social detriment.... one of the questions on a very well used dating site it "do you own a car" I can tell you that people have declined to go out on a date with me because I don't own a car and most of my work mates "don't know how I do it!"
    Even in Toronto, Montreal and other transit-oriented North American cities there is very little stigma associated with not owning a car. I have a friend in Portland who makes six figures and yet got rid of his car. My point is, we don't have to become like Paris, but just need to increase our density and improve transit incrementally to achieve significant gains in this area.

    ^ Increasing density and better transit is exactly like becoming Paris or Toronto or Chicago or Beijing......Never did I advocate we build an arc de triomphe.

    I think you understand that there are ways to examine/compare and contrast and adopt best practices without giving up the distinct elements that makes us.. US!

    it amazes me how some people get their panties in a knot when we start looking at other centers and looking at what we can improve upon here. are we really that insecure here in Edmonton
    Last edited by edmonton daily photo; 21-12-2012 at 05:51 PM.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  30. #30

    Default

    Compares edmonton to Paris and then claims he didn't. Par for the course edp plays on.

  31. #31
    C2E Super Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Beautiful BC
    Posts
    1,657

    Default

    Edmonton - the Paris of the north!
    "The only really positive thing one could say about Vancouver is, itís not the rest of Canada." Oink (britishexpats.com)

  32. #32

    Default

    ^ you made my day..
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  33. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    PRT...I never compared Paris to Edmonton...
    Yes you did, here is part of the quote from post #6 "the henday wouldn't be an apt comparison.. more like the whitemud, 75st, yellowhead"
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  34. #34

    Default

    Prt that was in reply to someone who was trying to understand the layout of the tram network and used an Edmonton example
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  35. #35
    Partially Addicted to C2E
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edmonton daily photo View Post
    ^ Increasing density and better transit is exactly like becoming Paris or Toronto or Chicago or Beijing......Never did I advocate we build an arc de triomphe.

    I think you understand that there are ways to examine/compare and contrast and adopt best practices without giving up the distinct elements that makes us.. US!
    I'm not saying you did advocate that. I'm actually agreeing with you but expressing it in a different way. We need to move incrementally closer to a Paris-like model in terms of density and transit infrastructure. It doesn't mean we'll ever be like Paris in any other way.

  36. #36

    Default

    ^ 100% agreed... I also really think it's really important to physically see what is needed to get 60% of your population car free and almost 100% of your population car reduced...
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •