Results 1 to 37 of 37

Thread: Ward 1 News

  1. #1

    Default Ward 1 News

    I moved to Edmonton officially after the last election and haven't paid that much attention to our current Councillors activities. Is she going to run again? if so how is her track record?

  2. #2
    C2E Hard Core Contributor
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    2,653

    Default

    The Ward 1 Councillor is Linda Sloan.

    According to the daveberta blog, Linda is seeking re-election and will be facing at least one challenger. Link:http://daveberta.ca/edmonton-election-2013/

  3. #3
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton - Meadowlark Area
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    I moved to Edmonton officially after the last election and haven't paid that much attention to our current Councillors activities. Is she going to run again? if so how is her track record?
    I can confirm that Linda is definitely running again. As to her track record, being that I am the other candidate, I would defer to the C2E community to share their unbiased thoughts. Also, I would be more than happy to answer any questions you might have about my ideas for the Ward/City. Feel free to start a separate thread for the issues and I will respond to any questions.
    http://www.andrewknack.com
    http://twitter.com/AndrewKnack

  4. #4

    Default

    Hi Andrew i really like your idea of a united transportation network. i have never liked the idea that the city will make driving uncomfortable to force people to use bikes, lrt or transit.

    personalty i really like the LRT idea.. but i have concerns over the drivability of the Jasper Place area after it is implemented. when i was in college i helped build the south LRT route south of the university. as i lived out of the city at the time i had to drive there. and there was not as many issues even during construction. after going to university there i tried driving that area and its a complete nightmare. the above ground High Floor LRT completely from my perspective separated the areas on either side. essentially forcing many people tpo travel to the university via downtown rather then white mud.

    i do not want a repeat of the same disaster happening in the Jasper Place Area. i understand that low floor LRTs are way better for visual and impact to communities as well as integration with other traffic forms. but i have concerns especially at the Major intersections i use such as 87th, 156th. 149th,SPR. 142 SPR and 87th,170th. while i understand that i can still use whitemud. i don't think it should be faster for me to get by car to my work 60km away. then it is to get me by car to the places i want to shop be it at (City Center or Strathcona) (as by LRT and Bike and walking i have no carrying capacity).

    On that note what is your plan on 24h LRT service? i know that as a university student i had to drive to school. it was the only way to travel as buses and LRT was unavailable late at nights. i don't know how many times i have parked at the Downtown or University and been stuck walking across the high level bridge due to LRT and Bus stopping. I even tried to bike to school occasionally but this was impossible because i was not going to bike the river valley back to JP alone in the dark. (the fastest way). and i love bikeing, but it was too big of a hassle and danger due to the lack of transit options on a university/college student schedule. (unfortunately this meant driving back and forth from JP to the university, something that should never have happened in a transit friendly city. )

    what about bike lanes? i love the idea of them and i would gladly take bikes more frequently. but i do not feel comfortable riding on city streets. streets are 50-60km/h... im not a professional speed biker i can do 20-30 Tops. its not safe for me to be with that traffic. (heck i don't think its fair either of a car is doing 20-30 on a road its a danger upon itself). i end up either traveling the hard to access service roads (its really hard to access these on your bike sometimes) or riding on the sidewalk illegally. travel north south across ward 1... its next to impossible to find a bike route safely. i like styles like this http://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/med...long%2030w.jpg that are safe for pedestrians, slow bikes (10-20km/h) fast bikes (30-40km/h) and cars (50-60km/h). and as they keep the separation of traffic from fast large mass (cars) away from traffic that is slow and low mass (bikes/pedestrians) what is your plan for the bike routes in the city?

    How would you propose to change the density in Ward 1 especially around the new LRT hubs that is consistent with the community as it stands? and so you propose to change anything due to Jasper Places normally larger R1 lots?. will what you plan on changing make it easier for us to build new duplex/semidetached or rowhouseing consistent with the community and the higher density requirements of a compact community.

    Thank You

  5. #5
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton - Meadowlark Area
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    On that note what is your plan on 24h LRT service? i know that as a university student i had to drive to school. it was the only way to travel as buses and LRT was unavailable late at nights. i don't know how many times i have parked at the Downtown or University and been stuck walking across the high level bridge due to LRT and Bus stopping. I even tried to bike to school occasionally but this was impossible because i was not going to bike the river valley back to JP alone in the dark. (the fastest way). and i love bikeing, but it was too big of a hassle and danger due to the lack of transit options on a university/college student schedule. (unfortunately this meant driving back and forth from JP to the university, something that should never have happened in a transit friendly city. )
    Although I never stayed at the U of A beyond when the buses stopped running, I would support 24 hour transit service for the LRT and select bus routes. I understand that there is a cost that we will likely not be able to make up through fares but certain services, like 24 hour transit, should be available for specific routes in Edmonton. Most of the major routes already run quite late, for example the #1 runs until 1:38am and starts up at 4:43am so all the city would need to do is run it twice more to make it a full 24 hour service.

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    what about bike lanes? i love the idea of them and i would gladly take bikes more frequently. but i do not feel comfortable riding on city streets. streets are 50-60km/h... im not a professional speed biker i can do 20-30 Tops. its not safe for me to be with that traffic. (heck i don't think its fair either of a car is doing 20-30 on a road its a danger upon itself). i end up either traveling the hard to access service roads (its really hard to access these on your bike sometimes) or riding on the sidewalk illegally. travel north south across ward 1... its next to impossible to find a bike route safely. i like styles like this http://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/med...long%2030w.jpg that are safe for pedestrians, slow bikes (10-20km/h) fast bikes (30-40km/h) and cars (50-60km/h). and as they keep the separation of traffic from fast large mass (cars) away from traffic that is slow and low mass (bikes/pedestrians) what is your plan for the bike routes in the city?
    I started riding my bike in Edmonton last year and I am also not comfortable riding on the more active roadways. There is already a plan for bike lanes in Ward 1 on 95th Avenue from 189th Street to 142nd Street. I would prefer to see separated bike lanes with some type of small physical barrier or a bike path like we already have on 100th Avenue. I really like the design of the bike path in the link you shared and plan to explore that further. As I mentioned on my website, the goal of getting people to take different methods of transit should not be accomplished by making driving harder but rather by making other alternatives more appealing/efficient. I think people would be more willing to try cycling if we had bike paths or at least a separated bike lane with a barrier to separate cars and bikes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    How would you propose to change the density in Ward 1 especially around the new LRT hubs that is consistent with the community as it stands? and so you propose to change anything due to Jasper Places normally larger R1 lots?. will what you plan on changing make it easier for us to build new duplex/semidetached or rowhouseing consistent with the community and the higher density requirements of a compact community.

    Thank You
    There were some changes to the Mature Neighbourhood Overlay that passed on March 18th to allow for the subdivision of the 50' lots. I think this is a step in the right direction to help increase density within some of our more mature neighbourhoods. Another important step that will make it easier to increase density will likely be addressed by Councillor Henderson's motion to look into privacy and sunlight policies that can be put into the zoning bylaw. Many people will say they are interested in seeing density increase until it is about to happen next door. If we can have specific bylaws in place that will alleviate those concerns, I believe you will see more people and community leagues proactively support increased density.

    It is worth noting that many of the Jasper Place communities (Canora, West Jasper Place/Sherwood, Britannia Youngstown and Glenwood) already have higher than average density yet enrollment in community schools is low and in fact, some run the risk of closing in the near future. Because of that, simply increasing density in those communities may not actually help them address their concerns. There needs to be a better understanding of what type of amenities and services young families are looking for when purchasing a home and I believe the city should complete a study to learn that information. Once we have the results, we can create a proper Area Redevelopment Plan that will actually have the intended results of breathing new life into the communities. The city is currently working on the Jasper Place ARP but I do not believe we have the right information to make this as successful as it could be. The next Jasper Place ARP meeting is June 10th so we will see what new information the city will bring to the table.

    Finally, with regards to the rest of the ward, a possible expansion of the Cornerstones project to some of the communities in the ward could help make these areas more vibrant and sustainable.
    http://www.andrewknack.com
    http://twitter.com/AndrewKnack

  6. #6
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307

    Default

    I really hope I see some candidates expressing some concrete ideas.

    When I look at campaign websites for city council candidates, I see a lot of policy buzzwords and high-end fluff..."I believe in vibrancy, sustainability, public transit, safe communities, yadda cubed"....might as well state you like puppies and babies while you're at it.

    What concrete ideas do candidates have for vibrancy, safe communities, public transit, sustainability, fiscal responsibility, etc?
    What's your stance on current and long-term issues?
    What's your stance on the current and future big-ticket projects - arena, Quarters, YXD redevelopment, LRT expansion, Rossdale, river valley development, parks, etc?
    What is broken and how will you fix it?
    Where is improvement needed and how will you improve it?
    Where do you want your ward, the city and the metro area to be in 20 years time?
    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  7. #7
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton - Meadowlark Area
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic Death Monkey View Post
    I really hope I see some candidates expressing some concrete ideas.

    When I look at campaign websites for city council candidates, I see a lot of policy buzzwords and high-end fluff..."I believe in vibrancy, sustainability, public transit, safe communities, yadda cubed"....might as well state you like puppies and babies while you're at it.

    What concrete ideas do candidates have for vibrancy, safe communities, public transit, sustainability, fiscal responsibility, etc?
    What's your stance on current and long-term issues?
    What's your stance on the current and future big-ticket projects - arena, Quarters, YXD redevelopment, LRT expansion, Rossdale, river valley development, parks, etc?
    What is broken and how will you fix it?
    Where is improvement needed and how will you improve it?
    Where do you want your ward, the city and the metro area to be in 20 years time?
    As I did three years ago, I will be posting a full platform with specific action items that constituents can hold me accountable to. I am still revising my platform as I have been meeting with and will continue to be meeting with members of Council, city staff and community league members to form concrete plans. My goal is to have it complete by mid-July although I would like to start posting some of the ideas once we re-launch the website in the next month.

    With that said, I do have a few specific points that I am happy to talk about. As mentioned in the last post, one of the ways to address vibrancy and sustainability is to expand upon the Cornerstones program. Currently there are only a few communities that are part of a pilot and I would like to see it roll out across the city.

    With regards to LRT expansion in the west, I want to have the funding secured from all levels of Government in the next 4 years so that it will be complete in the next decade. How we go about this is a bit more challenging as it requires cooperation from the Federal and Provincial Government. The new Council will have to make this a Provincial and Federal election issue in order to achieve the desired results.

    My opinion of some of the other big projects are similar to my 2010 stance. I am a big fan of the arena district but did not support the specific funding model that was approved back in 2011. I am looking forward to its completion as I think it will help decrease the vacancy rate downtown and it could motivate the other levels of Government to provide us with the funds to complete the entire LRT network. I did support the closure of the City Centre Airport and am looking forward to the new development.

    Improvement is needed in the public consultation process, specifically with regards to follow-up. Over the past six years I have been attending the WLRT meetings, I find that people believe their voice has not been heard because their comments in the past sessions were not acknowledged. Simply addressing the feedback and explaining why something can or cannot be done will go a long way in getting the public to be more supportive of larger scale projects. I will also be holding a monthly meeting within the ward to provide residents with an opportunity to learn about why I voted the way I did as well as gather feedback on upcoming projects.

    Another area to improve is transparency. I will be posting all campaign donations online prior to the election so that the public has the opportunity to review them and ask me any questions. Ideally there will be more than three or four candidates - as was the case in 2010 - making that information public prior to October 21st.

    Hopefully that begins to provide you with a bit more insight into some of the ideas I would like to implement. I will be posting a far more detailed platform in the next two months so there will still be plenty of time to review it and ask further questions before the election.
    http://www.andrewknack.com
    http://twitter.com/AndrewKnack

  8. #8

    Default

    Hi Andrew

    On your City Center Airport Comment.

    Me and quite a few people i know are either originally from Parkland County or have great ties between the areas of PC and Ward 1. what are your thoughts on the new Parkland Airport concept that is proposed close to Spruce Grove to replace the City Center when it does decommission.

  9. #9
    C2E Hard Core Contributor
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    3,160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    I moved to Edmonton officially after the last election and haven't paid that much attention to our current Councillors activities. Is she going to run again? if so how is her track record?
    As a former resident of the Ward I can say that Sloan is terrible. Back when it was the 1 Ward - 2 Councillor system she was able to fly under the radar and let Leibovici do most of the heavy lifting. Now, that she's the lone Councillor in her Ward we've all been able to see what she is really like.
    Don't feed the trolls!

  10. #10
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton - Meadowlark Area
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Himser View Post
    Hi Andrew

    On your City Center Airport Comment.

    Me and quite a few people i know are either originally from Parkland County or have great ties between the areas of PC and Ward 1. what are your thoughts on the new Parkland Airport concept that is proposed close to Spruce Grove to replace the City Center when it does decommission.
    Honestly I am somewhat indifferent to it. If someone is interested in opening an airport outside of the city to fill a need they feel exists, then the market will decide whether or not it is viable. I want to see our International Airport grow so we continue to get more direct flights which will help attract more business to Edmonton and area.
    http://www.andrewknack.com
    http://twitter.com/AndrewKnack

  11. #11
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Downtown Edmonton
    Posts
    46,996

    Default

    Good to meet you last night Andrew and best of luck.
    www.decl.org

    Ottawa-Edmonton-Vancouver-Edmonton

  12. #12
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307

    Default

    Sloan is NOT running again!

    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  13. #13
    C2E Stole my Heart!!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ozerna, North Edmonton
    Posts
    8,962

    Default

    Great news, she was horrible.

  14. #14
    C2E SME
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sherwood Park, AB
    Posts
    10,927

    Default

    I think it's time for a change in Ward 1. Sloan can spend more time with her duties at the AUMA.
    "Talk minus action equals zero." - Joe Keithley, D. O. A.

  15. #15
    C2E Hard Core Contributor
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    3,160

    Default

    Don't feed the trolls!

  16. #16
    C2E Stole my Heart!!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ozerna, North Edmonton
    Posts
    8,962

    Default

    ^ Awesome gif.

  17. #17
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307
    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  18. #18
    C2E Hard Core Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Red Deer
    Posts
    2,561

    Default

    I take it Andrew Knack's got this in the bag, then?

  19. #19

    Default

    Person dedicates years of their live to sitting on council long hours and gets "don't let the door hit you on the way out vitriol.

    For one I applaud Sloan for being responsible, concerned, and a fiscal conservative on a spending city council.

    Best wishes for Sloan in future endeavors. I for one appreciate what you brought to council all these years.
    "if god exists and he allowed that to happen, then its better that he doesn't exist"

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
    Person dedicates years of their live to sitting on council long hours and gets "don't let the door hit you on the way out vitriol.

    For one I applaud Sloan for being responsible, concerned, and a fiscal conservative on a spending city council.

    Best wishes for Sloan in future endeavors. I for one appreciate what you brought to council all these years.
    Yet, you have no problem bashing other Councillors... interesting double standard...

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medwards View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
    Person dedicates years of their live to sitting on council long hours and gets "don't let the door hit you on the way out vitriol.

    For one I applaud Sloan for being responsible, concerned, and a fiscal conservative on a spending city council.

    Best wishes for Sloan in future endeavors. I for one appreciate what you brought to council all these years.
    Yet, you have no problem bashing other Councillors... interesting double standard...

    I think one exiting alderman. Kim Krushell.

    If theres been another let me know so no plural necessary here.

    In Krushell's case my concern being that she misrepresented the arena funding throughout, was a lobbyist for public funding arrangement throughout, and basically voted yes to anything while on council. Including her being an active and vocal supporter of the parade float. She'll support anything as the float kind of symbolically demonstrated. Somehow I'll remember that one.

    That said, that's just my view.

    Most people serving public office should be deserving of some support. Kim gets lots of support so I don't think theres any shortcoming in that regard. But I should offer it too and point taken.

    So a wish for Kim Krushell to have further positive endeavors.
    "if god exists and he allowed that to happen, then its better that he doesn't exist"

  22. #22

    Default

    So I get it, its okay because you don't like one Councillor that "don't let the door hit you on the way out" is acceptable. But because someone else says it about a Councillor you favour, its not okay.

    Welcome to the double standard.

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Medwards View Post
    So I get it, its okay because you don't like one Councillor that "don't let the door hit you on the way out" is acceptable. But because someone else says it about a Councillor you favour, its not okay.

    Welcome to the double standard.
    Its not OK.

    In the case of Krushell or any councillor Its wrong to take that approach. That is admitted.

    I acknowledge. I repeat.

    For the time spent, and commitments, and meetings, frankly I'm thankful anybody wants to do this work. I shouldn't detract from it in anyway.
    Last edited by Replacement; 16-08-2013 at 02:57 PM.
    "if god exists and he allowed that to happen, then its better that he doesn't exist"

  24. #24

    Default

    I feel council would have been better without Sloan.

    That's my 2 cents.
    "Do you give people who already use transit a better service, or do you build it where they don't use it in the hopes they might start to use it?" Nenshi

  25. #25
    C2E Stole my Heart!!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ozerna, North Edmonton
    Posts
    8,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medwards View Post
    so i get it, its okay because you don't like one councillor that "don't let the door hit you on the way out" is acceptable. But because someone else says it about a councillor you favour, its not okay.

    Welcome to the double standard.
    +1000

  26. #26
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307

    Default

    Sloan was interviewed by CTV and she said she is retiring because she met some guy and she's getting married. I thought she was already married with kids, so this surprised me.
    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  27. #27
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Albert, Alberta
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TerryH View Post
    I take it Andrew Knack's got this in the bag, then?
    Maybe. But with Sloan out of the picture this may motivate others to run who didn't think they stood a chance against her.
    Against everything that supports status quo.
    http://twitter.com/LeePasternak

  28. #28
    C2E Hard Core Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Red Deer
    Posts
    2,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lpasternak1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TerryH View Post
    I take it Andrew Knack's got this in the bag, then?
    Maybe. But with Sloan out of the picture this may motivate others to run who didn't think they stood a chance against her.
    Even if others did, it's getting late and, unless someone has some name recognition, the chances of winning are slim.

  29. #29

    Default

    The reason Linda Sloan (and Mayor Mandel) aren't running again is because that recording of Mandel attempting to bribe Sloan to get her to change her vote on retaining the trolley system has again reappeared on the net. Sloan accepted his bribe offer, but then Mandel failed to make good on his end of the deal. That's why Sloan voted against everything Mandel was in favor of from that day on.

  30. #30
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307

    Default

    Leave it to Sloan to declare she's re-running only to change her mind just 2 months before the election.
    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  31. #31
    C2E SME
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sherwood Park, AB
    Posts
    10,927

    Default

    I think Sloan saw the writing on the wall. How much support did she really have from fellow councillors?

    Also, I think that Ward 1's population growth will be west of Anthony Henday Drive (Lewis Farms, Potter Greens and Secord), in recent years.
    "Talk minus action equals zero." - Joe Keithley, D. O. A.

  32. #32
    First One is Always Free
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton - Meadowlark Area
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TerryH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by lpasternak1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TerryH View Post
    I take it Andrew Knack's got this in the bag, then?
    Maybe. But with Sloan out of the picture this may motivate others to run who didn't think they stood a chance against her.
    Even if others did, it's getting late and, unless someone has some name recognition, the chances of winning are slim.
    I appreciate your optimism but as I have been saying the last few days, there is still a great deal of work to be done. I made a commitment to knock on 18,000 doors and although I have been able to knock on 10,000 so far, I still have to keep working over the next 63 days so that I can reach the remaining 8,000 doors and earn the support of those across Ward 1.
    http://www.andrewknack.com
    http://twitter.com/AndrewKnack

  33. #33
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Downtown Edmonton
    Posts
    46,996

    Default

    ^nicely done and best of luck Andrew.
    www.decl.org

    Ottawa-Edmonton-Vancouver-Edmonton

  34. #34

    Default

    Candidates running so far:

    Andrew Knack
    Sharon Maclise
    Edmonton first, everything else second.

  35. #35
    C2E Long Term Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downtown
    Posts
    31,307

    Default

    http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...453/story.html

    EDMONTON - Sean Amato has announced he is running for city council in Ward 1.

    Amato has been a broadcast journalist for 10 years and has covered city hall meetings and public hearings for five years. He is taking a break from his job at CTV to work on his campaign.

    He joins declared candidates Bryan Sandilands, Jamie Post, Andrew Knack and Sharon Maclise in the race to fill the seat being vacated by retiring Coun. Linda Sloan.
    “You have to dream big. If we want to be a little city, we dream small. If we want to be a big city, we dream big, and this is a big idea.” - Mayor Stephen Mandel, 02/22/2012

  36. #36
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    edmonton
    Posts
    4,586

    Default

    OMG, his voice/delivery drives me nuts. Even if he has much to offer in his platform my ears will just close up.
    Nisi Dominus Frustra

  37. #37

    Default

    I'd be for Knack. The guy's paid his dues.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •