Page 72 of 72 FirstFirst ... 22626869707172
Results 7,101 to 7,175 of 7175

Thread: Trump - misc

  1. #7101

    Default

    From Trump's favorite magazine

    Ten Reasons Saudi Arabia Had No Concern About Trump In Slaying Khashoggi
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/charles.../#97e5d2330e28
    one can never forget the lesson of 9/11 – that American administrations will look the other way about what the Saudis do, even to Americans. Fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers had Saudi Passports. Osama bin Laden was son of the Saudi monarchy’s billionaire construction boss. The Saudis lavishly funded Osama’s mission in Afghanistan. George W. Bush provided a special plane to rush the Saudi aristocracy out of the United States, back to Saudi Arabia, before the FBI could question them in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. The indicia of Saudi connection to 9/11 are extensive. Yet the Saudis were never held accountable.

    None of these ten points are lost on the Saudi monarchy. By their slaying of Khashoggi, the Saudis show their calculation that Trump will not let them be too harmed.
    Trump will believe anything that Mohammed bin Salman says.

    2016 U.S. presidential election
    In August 2016, Donald Trump Jr. had a meeting with an envoy representing Mohammed bin Salman and Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi. The envoy offered help to the Trump presidential campaign. The meeting included Joel Zamel, an Israeli specialist in social media manipulation, Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, and Blackwater founder Erik Prince
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_bin_Salman
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  2. #7102

    Default

    Yeah, yeah. We know.




    It's just another quiet day in terms of real news.

  3. #7103
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    LOL! they look like CNN robots..

  4. #7104

    Default

    Probably better that RT robots like the commentator above yours

  5. #7105

    Default

    You've got to love the diversity this is Faux "News". It looks the the Aryan Network.


  6. #7106

    Default

    Looks like Trump's mistresses alumni yearbook.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  7. #7107

    Default

    The Politics of Blondness, From Aphrodite to Ivanka

    “For as long as Hillary Clinton was a public figure, Hillary Clinton was a blonde.”

    https://www.thecut.com/2017/08/polit...nka-trump.html

  8. #7108

    Default

    Did Trump Offer $1 Million If Elizabeth Warren Could Show Native American Heritage?
    The president denied making the offer, but video from a July 2018 speech demonstrates otherwise.

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tr...ion-offer-dna/
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  9. #7109
    Addicted to C2E
    Mr. Reality Check

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    11,752

    Default

    doubling down on bets not made, the donald will be speaking to the family research council's values voters summit. as the southern poverty law centre has labelled the frc a hate group since 2006, one has to wonder whose values the donald will be there to support.

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...gtaNYMU6LjfEBA
    "If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee

  10. #7110

    Default

    L a u g h o u t l o u d !

    Trump slams Sears leadership after bankruptcy filing, saying the company was 'obviously improperly run for many years'
    https://www.thisisinsider.com/trump-...mments-2018-10


    Trump should know, he went bankrupt more often than I have fingers on my hand. Only guy who could run three casinos into bankruptcy at the same time.
    Last edited by Edmonton PRT; Yesterday at 05:11 PM.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  11. #7111

    Default

    Bwah-ha-ha-ha!!!!!

    Oh, mercy....

    Only the BEST dating app....

    Bwah-ha-ha-ha

    Trump-Themed Dating App Reportedly Leaks Personal Data Hours After Launch

    "Mere hours after Fox News revealed the existence of a new Trump-centric dating app, a security researcher has apparently uncovered evidence that “Donald Daters” is leaking sensitive user information online.

    The app, whose obvious tagline is “Make America Date Again,” is reportedly dumping photos and biographical information about its users into a publicly accessible database—and may even be leaking authentication tokens, which could grant full access to a person’s account, including their private messages.

    ---

    Motherboard said after testing the app that it seemed “barely functional,” with it being unable apparently to locate a single user in New York City identifying as a woman. Various options within the app are said to be on the fritz. (Gizmodo has not itself tested that app, but commends Motherboard for taking the plunge.)

    In a statement to Fox News, Donald Daters CEO Emily Moreno said that many Trump supporters having found dating “nearly impossible” thanks to “liberal intolerance.”

    https://gizmodo.com/trump-themed-dat...ata-1829769102

  12. #7112
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Yup, Dotty Warren is running. Trump can beat her easily, even a few democrats thinks she is a barn cake

  13. #7113

    Default

    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.

  14. #7114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    So what does Hillary Clinton think? CNN’s viewpoint:

    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power - CNNPolitics

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/14/polit...wer/index.html


    Maybe we’ll get some great entertainment going forward of Hillary Clinton out Trumping Trump by tossing out sensational and distracting comments every few days.
    Last edited by KC; Yesterday at 09:44 PM.

  15. #7115
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    So what does Hillary Clinton think? CNNís viewpoint:

    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power - CNNPolitics

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/14/polit...wer/index.html


    Maybe weíll get some great entertainment going forward of Hillary Clinton out Trumping Trump by tossing out sensational and distracting comments every few days.

    She's not doing the party any favours..it was an abuse of power, everyone knows that, plus Jennifer Flowers and the others..slick Willy had many affairs..

  16. #7116

    Default

    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>

  17. #7117

    Default

    Let's ask Melania about abuse of power. She said that she was the most abused woman in the world. Look no further than her bully of a husband.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  18. #7118
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Not once did she say abused, she said bullied, and the lefty cows are just that. Jealous of her..

  19. #7119
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton area.
    Posts
    7,068

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, Iím automatically attracted to beautiful ó I just start kissing them. Itís like a magnet. Just kiss. I donít even wait. And when youíre a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>
    You remind me of the preacher guy on Whyte. Just keep on preaching, never quit. A sip of Kool-aid and preach some more. On and on in a fog of some sort. Lol. Bill Clinton was sex maniacal as they come. We only got to hear about a bit of it. Several when there were likely several hundred. R
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, Iím automatically attracted to beautiful ó I just start kissing them. Itís like a magnet. Just kiss. I donít even wait. And when youíre a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>
    You remind me of the preacher guy on Whyte. Just keep on preaching, never quit. A sip of Kool-aid and preach some more. On and on in a fog of some sort. Lol. Bill Clinton was sex maniacal as they come. We only got to hear about a bit of it. Several when there were likely several hundred. Remember this was in the day before the technology of today.

  20. #7120
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton area.
    Posts
    7,068

    Default

    Also Donald seems to be behaving himself while POTUS. Bill would not. Thatís important. Also when Malania said bullied she was not referring to her husband it was by others, she said her marriage is fine.
    Last edited by Drumbones; Today at 01:18 AM.

  21. #7121

    Default

    ^ Heh. Oh, man. Word of advice, preacher guy. Don't post while durnk.

    "Donald seems to be behaving himself while POTUS" is objectively not a plus.

    And "when Malania said bullied she was not referring to her husband it was by others, she said her marriage is fine" is only slightly less than convincing.

    But, please, do continue to provide c2e character witness to those (e.g. Hello Lady) who think Sons of Odin's insignificant profile is (oh, dear god) somehow "LOL."

    "That's important." (!)

    Funnily enough, "dufus" and "putz" are synonyms. Keep digging!


  22. #7122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>
    I’ll post this again:


    Reckoning With Bill Clinton’s Sex Crimes - The Atlantic

    “...let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger, stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s. Juanita Broaddrick reported that when she was a volunteer on one of his gubernatorial campaigns, she had arranged to meet him in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute, he had changed the location to her room in the hotel, where she says he very violently raped her. She said that she fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left her bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel, he caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones, and, Jones said, he sent a couple of state troopers to invite her to his suite, where he exposed his penis to her and told her to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met him in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that he groped her, rubbed his erect penis on her, and pushed her hand to his crotch.

    It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. ...”

    https://www.theatlantic.com/entertai...crimes/545729/
    Last edited by KC; Today at 06:53 AM.

  23. #7123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    So what does Hillary Clinton think? CNN’s viewpoint:

    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power - CNNPolitics

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/14/polit...wer/index.html


    Maybe we’ll get some great entertainment going forward of Hillary Clinton out Trumping Trump by tossing out sensational and distracting comments every few days.

    She's not doing the party any favours..it was an abuse of power, everyone knows that, plus Jennifer Flowers and the others..slick Willy had many affairs..
    It’s worked amazingly well for Trump. Kept the media focus on him and off the party. Play the media. Defend the indefensible and still, the followers happily follow along. Hillary Clinton has maniacal followers too. So she can play Trump’s game to make the story about her whenever anything good comes up about Trump

  24. #7124
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Some women are upset with her. The Clinton's can never shut up
    As for Warren..



    Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, who ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...-american.html


    She appears to be upsetting everyone..lol

  25. #7125
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Also Donald seems to be behaving himself while POTUS. Bill would not. Thatís important. Also when Malania said will she was not referring to her husband it was by others, she said her marriage is fine.
    Exactly..

    You remind me of the preacher guy on Whyte. Just keep on preaching, never quit. A sip of Kool-aid and preach some more. On and on in a fog of some sort. Lol. Bill Clinton was sex maniacal as they come. We only got to hear about a bit of it. Several when there were likely several hundred.


    Too funny!

  26. #7126

    Default

    Elizabeth Warren has never claimed a benefit based on her native ancestors. She simply stated that she had an ancestor who was native. Tump said she had none. He offered a $1 million donation to charity if she took a DNA test. She has done so and proven that she was speaking the truth. Trump now saying "who cares" and that he never offered the $1 million even though there is video of him doing exactly that.

    Meanwhile, the Trumpers are continuing to talk about how Trump is so much more moral and truthful than pretty much anyone else.

    And I'm glad that Melania is happy in her marriage and that she's totally cool with Trump screwing porn stars and sexually assaulting women. Good for her that she's found someone with the same moral code as her husband.

  27. #7127

    Default

    Let's not forget that Trump had paid a porn star $130,000 just after Melania gave birth to their son.

    'I'll give her a week' to lose the baby weight, Trump said of Melania, months before alleged tryst with porn star
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.177400c5845c
    Seven months before an alleged tryst with porn star Stormy Daniels, Donald Trump told radio host Howard Stern that he would give his pregnant wife, Melania, a couple of days — or maybe a week — to regain her model figure after giving birth.

    “You know, Howard, she’s got the kind of a body and makeup where, about one day after the baby, it’s going to be the same as it was before,” Trump said during an appearance on Stern’s show on Dec. 7, 2005.
    “You’re giving her one day?” Stern asked.
    “One or two,” Trump replied.
    Moments later, the future president reconsidered. “I think I’ll give her a week,” he said. “No, I’ll give her a week.”


    Trump’s remarks drew laughter from Stern’s female co-host, Robin Quivers, and Trump ultimately indicated that his ultimatum to Melania was not entirely serious.
    “If there’s cellulite, will you be man enough to stay in the relationship?” Stern asked at one point.


    “I will,” Trump answered. “I will love her so much. You have no idea. I’m a very loyal person. I will love her so much.”


    The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Speaking generally about his appearances on Stern’s show, Trump told The Washington Post in April 2016: “I never anticipated running for office or being a politician, so I could have fun with Howard on the radio, and everyone would love it. People do love it. I could say whatever I wanted when I was an entrepreneur, a business guy.”


    Trump also said in the 2005 interview that he had seen “beautiful women that for the rest of their lives have become [a] horror” after giving birth.
    “You know, they gain like 250 pounds,” he told Stern. “It’s like a disaster.”
    At the time of the interview, Melania Trump was five months pregnant with her first child, Trump’s fifth. Barron Trump was born March 20, 2006.


    Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, told In Touch magazine that she had sex with Trump in July 2006 at a golf tournament in Nevada. The In Touch interview was conducted in 2011 but published for the first time this week. Trump denies the affair with Daniels. And Daniels denies a Wall Street Journal report that she accepted $130,000 from Trump attorney Michael Cohen to keep quiet during the 2016 presidential election.


    Trump’s comments to Stern fit a pattern of public remarks and alleged behavior during and after Melania’s pregnancy. The infamous “Access Hollywood” video, in which Trump boasted about groping and kissing women without their consent, was recorded in September 2005, when Melania was about two months along.


    Celebrity journalist Natasha Stoynoff claims that Trump pressed her against a wall and forcibly kissed her in December 2005, around the time of the Stern interview. At the time, Stoynoff was interviewing the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago for a People magazine feature. She wrote about the alleged encounter in October 2016.
    And then Trump lies and lies about it while his own lawyer pleads guilty in Court. In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight charges, including one related to the scandal, and he stated under oath that he paid Daniels "in coordination with and at the direction of a candidate for federal office," meaning Trump.

    So who is the bully that Melania is talking about?
    Last edited by Edmonton PRT; Today at 07:37 AM.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  28. #7128
    C2E SME
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Downtown Edmonton
    Posts
    10,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>
    Lewinsky is not the only woman who was caught up in Clinton's libido, and several made credible accusations of outright harassment or rape. And in the Juanita Broaddrick case, it's likely that Hillary knew about her keeping the rape quiet during his governorship campaign, and thanked her for it personally at a campaign event. If we are to believe the victims, then Bill Clinton is a rapist. Why the double standard here?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/entertai...crimes/545729/

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...y-knew/546170/

    https://theslot.jezebel.com/what-the...ick-1785297439

    Quote Originally Posted by Juanita Broaddrick
    As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.
    Bill Clinton is a rapist and/or sexual predator, and Hillary was either willfully blind because it might get in the way of her/their careers (likely) or a complete dummy (incredibly unlikely) to not know what her husband was up to. Why do you find it so hard to condemn them, and so easy to condemn Trump for similar accusations?

  29. #7129

    Default

    Trump is behaving himself while POTUS What a load of misinformed right wing bullsiht

  30. #7130

    Default

    A CNN writer’s commentary:


    Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics

    Twenty-four hours after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren shocked the political world with a five-minute video (and a mountain of documentation) aimed at putting to bed the controversy over her claims of Native American heritage, it's becoming increasingly clear the strategy amounts to a swing and a miss.

    Warren's goal was to take the issue of her heritage off the table for nervous Democrats and to show that she was ready, willing and able to stand up to President Donald Trump if and when the time came that she was the party's nominee against him in 2020. The problem is that, when you strip away all of the glitz of her well-produced video, you are left with this: There's still no certainty that Warren is, in any meaningful way, Native American. ...”

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html

  31. #7131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    In making excuses for Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, you seem to be doing the very thing you are accusing H.L. of doing.

    Bill Clinton has more history than just M.L. The difference between his treatment then and the treatment of alleged predators today it seems is his luck of timing plus as that Atlantic article provides supporting evidence for, women in those days with their own agenda were quite willing to defend Bill Clinton and further victimize his alleged victims.

    Seems that people today still don’t mind doing so in order to demonize anything to do with Trump.
    Last edited by KC; Today at 09:22 AM.

  32. #7132
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    A CNN writer’s commentary:


    Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics

    Twenty-four hours after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren shocked the political world with a five-minute video (and a mountain of documentation) aimed at putting to bed the controversy over her claims of Native American heritage, it's becoming increasingly clear the strategy amounts to a swing and a miss.

    Warren's goal was to take the issue of her heritage off the table for nervous Democrats and to show that she was ready, willing and able to stand up to President Donald Trump if and when the time came that she was the party's nominee against him in 2020. The problem is that, when you strip away all of the glitz of her well-produced video, you are left with this: There's still no certainty that Warren is, in any meaningful way, Native American. ...”

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html
    She sure made it worse if CNN is saying so..

  33. #7133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    A CNN writer’s commentary:


    Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics

    Twenty-four hours after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren shocked the political world with a five-minute video (and a mountain of documentation) aimed at putting to bed the controversy over her claims of Native American heritage, it's becoming increasingly clear the strategy amounts to a swing and a miss.

    Warren's goal was to take the issue of her heritage off the table for nervous Democrats and to show that she was ready, willing and able to stand up to President Donald Trump if and when the time came that she was the party's nominee against him in 2020. The problem is that, when you strip away all of the glitz of her well-produced video, you are left with this: There's still no certainty that Warren is, in any meaningful way, Native American. ...”

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html
    She sure made it worse if CNN is saying so..
    ?? Are you implying that CNN is as bad as the primitive minded, tribalistic left or right supporters that can never speak a truth against their political horde?

  34. #7134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marcel Petrin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Was it morally wrong? Yup
    Was it an abuse of power? Don't know, we ween't there but Lewinsky was willing.
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? .
    I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
    . Again, no.

    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.

    Yeah, I can totally see where you draw the parallel. </Snark>
    Lewinsky is not the only woman who was caught up in Clinton's libido, and several made credible accusations of outright harassment or rape. And in the Juanita Broaddrick case, it's likely that Hillary knew about her keeping the rape quiet during his governorship campaign, and thanked her for it personally at a campaign event. If we are to believe the victims, then Bill Clinton is a rapist. Why the double standard here?

    https://www.theatlantic.com/entertai...crimes/545729/

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...y-knew/546170/

    https://theslot.jezebel.com/what-the...ick-1785297439

    Quote Originally Posted by Juanita Broaddrick
    As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.
    Bill Clinton is a rapist and/or sexual predator, and Hillary was either willfully blind because it might get in the way of her/their careers (likely) or a complete dummy (incredibly unlikely) to not know what her husband was up to. Why do you find it so hard to condemn them, and so easy to condemn Trump for similar accusations?
    The title and lead in to the second link above. Worth highlighting in light of Hillary Clinton’s recent statements about M.L.


    What Hillary Knew
    Hillary Clinton once tweeted that “every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.” What about Juanita Broaddrick?
    CAITLIN FLANAGAN
    NOV 17, 2017

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...y-knew/546170/

  35. #7135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    A CNN writer’s commentary:


    Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics

    Twenty-four hours after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren shocked the political world with a five-minute video (and a mountain of documentation) aimed at putting to bed the controversy over her claims of Native American heritage, it's becoming increasingly clear the strategy amounts to a swing and a miss.

    Warren's goal was to take the issue of her heritage off the table for nervous Democrats and to show that she was ready, willing and able to stand up to President Donald Trump if and when the time came that she was the party's nominee against him in 2020. The problem is that, when you strip away all of the glitz of her well-produced video, you are left with this: There's still no certainty that Warren is, in any meaningful way, Native American. ...”

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html
    She sure made it worse if CNN is saying so..
    ?? Are you implying that CNN is as bad as the primitive minded, tribalistic left or right supporters that can never speak a truth against their political horde?
    The rape allegation against Bill Clinton, explained - Vox

    “The interview was conducted on January 20, 1999, before the Senate ultimately acquitted Clinton on charges related to his affair with Monica Lewinsky on February 12. NBC delayed airing until February 24, and Broaddrick, frustrated, gave accounts to the Wall Street Journal editorial page, the Washington Post, and the New York Times in the meantime. ...“

    “She only came forward after she was interviewed by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's office and her allegation leaked. Broaddrick told the Journal that NBC News reporter Lisa Myers pursued her for nearly a year before she agreed to an interview, and that she came forward because she wanted to rebut false rumors circulating after her statements to prosecutors (like that David Broaddrick had accepted hush money from the Clintons in exchange for silence).

    Why Clinton's defenders discount Broaddrick's story

    ...”

    https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/1072258...ita-broaddrick

    Bolding mine.


    Recall the recent bashing - by those supporting the Trump tribe - of the Washington Post and NYT as being leftist supporters or tools. Yet note what companies are mentioned above.
    Last edited by KC; Today at 09:40 AM.

  36. #7136

    Default

    “The interview was conducted on January 20, 1999, before the Senate ultimately acquitted Clinton on charges related to his affair with Monica Lewinsky on February 12."

    So where are the the Senate investigations on Trump's affairs and possible assaults?
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  37. #7137

    Default

    ^ did alleged assaults occur while he was in office?

  38. #7138

    Default

    As far as I know, there is no statute of limitations on rape. Catholic Priests are being charged for their crimes done in the 1970's.



    According to Trump., they are all liars

    But these guys he trusts











    V Maybe this explains Trump

    Last edited by Edmonton PRT; Today at 10:13 AM.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  39. #7139
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    A CNN writerís commentary:


    Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics

    Twenty-four hours after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren shocked the political world with a five-minute video (and a mountain of documentation) aimed at putting to bed the controversy over her claims of Native American heritage, it's becoming increasingly clear the strategy amounts to a swing and a miss.

    Warren's goal was to take the issue of her heritage off the table for nervous Democrats and to show that she was ready, willing and able to stand up to President Donald Trump if and when the time came that she was the party's nominee against him in 2020. The problem is that, when you strip away all of the glitz of her well-produced video, you are left with this: There's still no certainty that Warren is, in any meaningful way, Native American. ...Ē

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html
    She sure made it worse if CNN is saying so..
    ?? Are you implying that CNN is as bad as the primitive minded, tribalistic left or right supporters that can never speak a truth against their political horde?
    You tell me

  40. #7140
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Federal judge dismisses Stormy Daniels' defamation lawsuit against Trump

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/15/polit...sed/index.html

  41. #7141

    Default

    Yes, Clinton could be quite the *******, particularly with women. However, the comment that started this before it devolved into whataboutism was
    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power
    As we saw with the Republican women voting for Kavanaugh, there are women today that are quite willing to not only demonize Dr. Ford to advance their won agenda, they are also quite willing to reward the perpetrator with a lifetime appointment in order to curry favour with a self-confessed sexual abuser. And there are also plenty of women that support them including at least one (so they say) here. These are the same people that supported Roy Moore, Trump's chosen candidate for the Senate that has a history of sexually abusing teenage girls while he was in his 30s.

    Yeah, let's demonize poor, poor Donald Trump.

    You want to discuss Clinton's time in his various offices, let's start a new thread.

  42. #7142

    Default

    Meanwhile, Tump take his usual course after the Story Daniels defamation lawsuit is dismissed.

    Trump launches ugly ‘horseface’ attack on Stormy Daniels while gloating about legal win

    “’Federal Judge throws out Stormy Danials lawsuit versus Trump. Trump is entitled to full legal fees.’” Trump tweeted. “@FoxNews Great, now I can go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer in the Great State of Texas. She will confirm the letter she signed! She knows nothing about me, a total con!”

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/tru...ing-legal-win/
    And Story Daniels responds.

    ‘Game on, Tiny’: Stormy Daniels tops Trump’s ‘horse face’ insult — and mocks his seeming ‘penchant for bestiality’

    In direct response to Trump’s mocking tweet, Daniels wrote, “Ladies and Gentlemen, may I present your president. In addition to his…umm…shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality.”

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/gam...nt-bestiality/

  43. #7143

    Default

    Mike Pompeo all smiles as he meets with accessory to murder.


    Sec. of State all smiles with Saudis while Turkish police confirm evidence U.S. resident was killed

    The Associated Press

    @AP
    BREAKING: Turkish official tells AP police found evidence in Saudi Consulate that Saudi writer Jamal Khashoggi was killed there.


    10:36 AM - Oct 16, 2018


    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...ent-was-killed

  44. #7144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yes, Clinton could be quite the *******, particularly with women. However, the comment that started this before it devolved into whataboutism was
    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power
    As we saw with the Republican women voting for Kavanaugh, there are women today that are quite willing to not only demonize Dr. Ford to advance their won agenda, they are also quite willing to reward the perpetrator with a lifetime appointment in order to curry favour with a self-confessed sexual abuser. And there are also plenty of women that support them including at least one (so they say) here. These are the same people that supported Roy Moore, Trump's chosen candidate for the Senate that has a history of sexually abusing teenage girls while he was in his 30s.

    Yeah, let's demonize poor, poor Donald Trump.

    You want to discuss Clinton's time in his various offices, let's start a new thread.


    Yeah, so does kkozoriz support the rights of men (alleged serial predators) to rape women... as long as they are on the left?

    Even though the victims are still alive and the very same political entities that re-victimized those women want to brush it under the rug so that they can focus on demonizing their enemy for doing the same. Just put it on ignore and continue to portray the right as somehow the degenerates that the left hopes not to have to address in order to keep it buried in the past - or in another thread - despite Hillary Clinton continued excuses being part of this thread.


    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    Bolding mine
    Last edited by KC; Today at 11:27 AM.

  45. #7145
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yes, Clinton could be quite the *******, particularly with women. However, the comment that started this before it devolved into whataboutism was
    Hillary Clinton: Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky wasn't abuse of power
    As we saw with the Republican women voting for Kavanaugh, there are women today that are quite willing to not only demonize Dr. Ford to advance their won agenda, they are also quite willing to reward the perpetrator with a lifetime appointment in order to curry favour with a self-confessed sexual abuser. And there are also plenty of women that support them including at least one (so they say) here. These are the same people that supported Roy Moore, Trump's chosen candidate for the Senate that has a history of sexually abusing teenage girls while he was in his 30s.

    Yeah, let's demonize poor, poor Donald Trump.

    You want to discuss Clinton's time in his various offices, let's start a new thread.


    Yeah, so does kkozoriz support the rights of men (alleged serial predators) to rape women... as long as they are on the left?

    Even though the victims are still alive and the very same political entities that re-victimized those women want to brush it under the rug so that they can focus on demonizing their enemy for doing the same. Just put it on ignore and continue to portray the right as somehow the degenerates that the left hopes to keep buried in the past - or in another thread - despite Hillary Clinton continued excuses being part of this thread.


    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Yeah, H.L. supports the rights of men to grab women by the pussy. Much better than being a professor of law. She is, however, an expert in bankruptcy law so Trump could actually have something in common with her, albeit from the other side.
    Bolding mine

    You font read kks posts do you? The guys a *****.

  46. #7146

    Default

    Did H.L. say that Trump should be investigated? Nope, elected president instead. That's the way you treat men that brag about sexual assault.

  47. #7147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Did H.L. say that Trump should be investigated? Nope, elected president instead. That's the way you treat men that brag about sexual assault.
    Insane isn’t it. Demand Trump be investigated but refuse to highlight the hypocrisy of a attacking political entity and its supporters not officially apologizing for their own dark past is also insane.

    It’s a situation not really that long ago - from the news stories of 1999 to those of 2015-18. A decade and a half. Times change but just a decade and a half is not an excuse to act as if such past injustices are ancient history with a wholly different cultural context affecting long dead people. These past alleged victims are still alive and out there being ignored by the ones demanding justice for other alleged victims of basically the same era. How insane is that?
    Last edited by KC; Today at 11:51 AM.

  48. #7148
    Addicted to C2E
    Mr. Reality Check

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    11,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Did H.L. say that Trump should be investigated? Nope, elected president instead. That's the way you treat men that brag about sexual assault.
    Insane isn’t it. Demand Trump be investigated but refuse to highlight the hypocrisy of a the same political entity and its supporters not officially apologizing for their own dark past is also insane.

    It’s a situation not really that long ago - from the news stories of 1999 to those of 2015-18. A decade and a half. Times change but just a decade and a half shouldn’t be an excuse to call such past injustices ancient history with a wholly different cultural context affecting long dead people. These past alleged victims are still out there being ignored by the ones demanding justice for other victims ocbghe sand era. How insane is that?
    if you really want to look at what being hypocritical looks like, you might want to look in a mirror.

    you do realize clinton was actually charged with lying under oath and obstruction of justice don't you? or have you forgotten or simply chosen to ignore the fact?

    you do realize clinton was actually impeached after being found guilty of both of those things don't you? or have you forgotten or simply chosen to ignore the fact?

    perhaps if you want to lessen the hypocrisy, you should be calling for trump to be charged and convicted and impeached as well, following which you can compare how they are/were treated by their own and by the other party and by the media?
    "If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee

  49. #7149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcantor View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Did H.L. say that Trump should be investigated? Nope, elected president instead. That's the way you treat men that brag about sexual assault.
    Insane isn’t it. Demand Trump be investigated but refuse to highlight the hypocrisy of a the same political entity and its supporters not officially apologizing for their own dark past is also insane.

    It’s a situation not really that long ago - from the news stories of 1999 to those of 2015-18. A decade and a half. Times change but just a decade and a half shouldn’t be an excuse to call such past injustices ancient history with a wholly different cultural context affecting long dead people. These past alleged victims are still out there being ignored by the ones demanding justice for other victims ocbghe sand era. How insane is that?
    if you really want to look at what being hypocritical looks like, you might want to look in a mirror.

    you do realize clinton was actually charged with lying under oath and obstruction of justice don't you? or have you forgotten or simply chosen to ignore the fact?

    you do realize clinton was actually impeached after being found guilty of both of those things don't you? or have you forgotten or simply chosen to ignore the fact?

    perhaps if you want to lessen the hypocrisy, you should be calling for trump to be charged and convicted and impeached as well, following which you can compare how they are/were treated by their own and by the other party and by the media?
    Trump is being investigated as well. We’ll see where that investigation goes.

    The Democrats however did a brilliant job of highlighting sexual misconduct of the Republicans and seem to have done well in their current actions against people of their own party abusing their positions. However, it’s not right to stay quiet about their ongoing support of a past President with equal or worse allegations being leveled at him (by his opponents and not from within his party).

    Who did the Democrats call on to rally for the party in the intervening years? I may be wrong but I believe Bill Clinton was invited to speak for their party on several occasions.


    This said it pretty well:

    Reckoning With Bill Clinton’s Sex Crimes - The Atlantic

    “The Democratic Party needs to make its own reckoning of the way it protected Bill Clinton. The party needs to come to terms with the fact that it was so enraptured by their brilliant, Big Dog president and his stunning string of progressive accomplishments that it abandoned some of its central principles. The party was on the wrong side of history, and there are consequences for that. Yet expedience is not the only reason to make this public accounting. If it is possible for politics and moral behavior to coexist, then this grave wrong needs to be acknowledged. ...”

    https://www.theatlantic.com/entertai...crimes/545729/

    One more:

    When it comes to Bill Clinton, Democrats are no better than Republicans | Charlotte Observer

    https://www.charlotteobserver.com/op...212484244.html





    Democrats won’t defeat Trump by becoming the Trumps of the left

    “Students of civil wars know they follow a well-established dynamic. A sect, radicalized by militant leaders, commits atrocities against another sect. The targeted group retaliates with its own massacres. And thus begins a cycle of violence. Think of ...

    “I got a taste of leftist anger when I went on NPR’s “On Point” last Thursday as part of my book tour to discuss my disenchantment with the right. One caller insisted that Trump wasn’t another Hitler — he was worse! Another listener emailed that I could never be forgiven for having been a conservative: “I truly hope you die in agony as a result of the climate change you promoted.” Two days later, the Intercept, the Breitbart of the left, wrote that I should be permanently exiled from the “sanctuary of politics” because of my (now recanted) support for the Iraq War — a position I shared with then-Sens. Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Charles E. Schumer, among other Democrats.

    This is the same kind of blind fury that drives so many Trump followers — and some leftist leaders are as willing as Trump to pour fuel on the partisan fire. When the administration began locking up the children of undocumented immigrants — truly an outrage — Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said protesters should harass Cabinet members whenever they go out in public. After the Kavanaugh vote, the liberal activist Kat Calvin tweeted that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) should never “have a moment of peace in public again.”

    More recently, Clinton told CNN: ...”


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...s-of-the-left/


    Last edited by KC; Today at 12:27 PM.

  50. #7150
    C2E SME
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Downtown Edmonton
    Posts
    10,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz
    Yes, Clinton could be quite the *******, particularly with women. However, the comment that started this before it devolved into whataboutism was
    Regardless of how it started, you made the below comment while discussing it:

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz
    Is there any indication that Bill did anything like this? *followed by Trump's quote about kissing women automatically*

    Again, no.


    That is a totally false statement. There are multiple allegations of sexual harassment, assault or rape against Bill Clinton, and have been for decades. Why do you try to ignore or minimize them? No, the accusations are not as relevant as the current sitting US President being a sexual predator. But you seem so eager to put them aside entirely, which is why even people like me who despise Trump and everything he represents feel the need to point out your inconsistencies and double standards.

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz
    So, one one hand we have the wife of a man who had an affair saying it wasn't an abuse of power. And on the other, we have a man bragging about sexual assault.
    That is a totally false comparison and completely ignores several other women who accused Clinton of far, far worse. Sexual assault, in fact. Even in your quote above, you're attempting to minimize Clinton's culpability by saying he was an "*******". I'm not entirely sure what you wrote there, but it wasn't "rapist" or "sexual predator" which you're all too happy to throw around in regards to Trump. That's the definition of a double standard.

  51. #7151
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Who did the Democrats call on to rally for the party in the intervening years? I may be wrong but I believe Bill Clinton was invited to speak for their party on several occasions.
    I don't think so, in fact his wife asked him to stay away...

  52. #7152

    Default

    Hillary's comment about "abuse of power" was specifically about the Lewinsky affair. And the word that was edited was a slang term used towards illegitimate children and starts with b and ends with D.

    And just a couple of weeks ago we had the current president saying this

    “Think of your sons. Think of your husbands,” Trump said to the crowd, defending Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh against the sexual-misconduct allegations that have delayed his confirmation vote. The allegations—which include an attempted assault, an unwanted exposure, and a drugging and gang rape—are currently being reviewed by the FBI. Kavanaugh has denied all of them.

    “A man’s life is in tatters. A man’s life is shattered. His wife is shattered,” Trump said while talking about how the Kavanaugh allegations. “They want to destroy people. These are really evil people.”


    Trump also called his nominee a “perfect human being” and said the allegations were “destroying his reputation.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/to-tru...rd-a-punchline
    Don't think of the effect that a sexual assault would have on a 15 year old girl. This man is perfect.

    And who else support Kavanaugh, calling allegations "irrelevant"? Franklin Graham, that paragon of the religious right.

    “It’s just a shame that a person like Judge Kavanaugh who has a stellar record — that somebody can bring something up that he did when he was a teenager close to 40 years ago,” Franklin Graham said in an interview Tuesday with the Christian Broadcasting Network. “That’s not relevant.”


    Graham is a prominent figure in evangelical Christian circles, partly because of his respected lineage. He is the president of the Christian relief organization Samaritan’s Purse and of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association ― and a staunch longtime defender of President Donald Trump.

    ---

    When Sells questioned him about the message his views send to sexual abuse victims, he said, “Well, there wasn’t a crime that was committed.”


    Graham then betrayed a lack of knowledge about Blasey’s allegation ― suggesting that even if the encounter did happen, “she said no and he respected it and walked away.”


    Sells pushed back to clarify that this isn’t the story Blasey came forward with. In fact, Blasey said she feared for her life during the alleged assault and was able to escape only when another person interrupted Kavanaugh.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...b07c23ef379cf0

    I don't believe for a second that Bill Clinton wold be nominated by the Democrats today based on his past behaviour. For Trump supporters, it's a badge of honour.
    Last edited by kkozoriz; Today at 12:41 PM.

  53. #7153
    C2E SME
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Downtown Edmonton
    Posts
    10,713

    Default

    We agree there, unfortunately.

  54. #7154
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    The FBI interviewed 146 people, that's a lot. A democrat voted for Kavanaugh , the FBI must have done a thorough investigation

  55. #7155

    Default

    A through investigation in 5 days and they didn't interview Ford or Kavanaugh or numerous other people that came forward?

    Here’s who was and wasn’t interviewed by FBI in the Brett Kavanaugh investigation

    Several of Kavanaugh’s Yale classmates have said they were frustrated after reaching out to the FBI, but were never contacted for an interview.


    Charles “Chad” Ludington has questioned Kavanaugh’s testimony about his drinking and said Kavanaugh was “a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker.”


    “When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive,” Ludington said in a statement. He and other Yale classmates and “drinking buddies” of Kavanaugh’s wrote a Washington Post opinion piece that Kavanaugh should not be confirmed because he was not honest at the Senate hearing about the extent of his drinking.


    Kerry Berchem, also a classmate, said she’s made multiple submissions to an FBI tip line but has not received a return phone call or a substantive response.


    NBC reports that Berchem had attempted to get text messages to the FBI that showed the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim against Ramirez ahead of the New Yorker article.


    Julie Swetnick, who has alleged she was assaulted at a party attended by Kavanaugh and his friends, was never contacted by FBI investigators, according to high-profile attorney Michael Avenatti.


    Kavanaugh has called her accusations a “joke” and “categorically” denies the allegations.


    Elizabeth Rasor, Mark Judge’s former girlfriend, has said that Judge recounted to her how he and several Georgetown Prep classmates took turns having sex with an intoxicated woman in 1988, according to the New Yorker.


    Her lawyer say the FBI didn’t respond to Rasor’s request to be interviewed and Judge’s lawyers have strongly denied the account.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/4520376/b...s-interviewed/

  56. #7156

    Default

    How very Christian of him.

    "If you make a sound, I'll kill you. There, all nice and legal."

    Former GOP lawmaker uses Bible to claim that it is not rape unless the ‘woman screams’

    “Some common sense definitions are necessary regarding this accusation,” he explained. “Rape is having sex with a woman while she screams for help. No scream, no rape according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24. Ford says Kavanaugh held his hand over her mouth so did she scream for help when his hand was elsewhere?”


    “Moreover, Matthew 18:16 clearly commands that there must be at least two witnesses to validate a charge against a person. This is a repeat of Old Testament law,” he lectured. “Ford has no witnesses. The other man who was allegedly there, Mark Judge said, “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way.’”


    Citing another person who may or may not have been at the party but saw nothing, Boys wrote: “That should settle it; now let’s all go home, pull down the shades, and get some sleep.”

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/for...woman-screams/

  57. #7157
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton area.
    Posts
    7,068

    Default

    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. Thatís funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol

  58. #7158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Who did the Democrats call on to rally for the party in the intervening years? I may be wrong but I believe Bill Clinton was invited to speak for their party on several occasions.
    I don't think so, in fact his wife asked him to stay away...
    If so then I may be wrong about him retaining any respectable standing amongst the “left” side of the political spectrum.

  59. #7159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    A through investigation in 5 days and they didn't interview Ford or Kavanaugh or numerous other people that came forward?

    Here’s who was and wasn’t interviewed by FBI in the Brett Kavanaugh investigation

    Several of Kavanaugh’s Yale classmates have said they were frustrated after reaching out to the FBI, but were never contacted for an interview.


    Charles “Chad” Ludington has questioned Kavanaugh’s testimony about his drinking and said Kavanaugh was “a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker.”


    “When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive,” Ludington said in a statement. He and other Yale classmates and “drinking buddies” of Kavanaugh’s wrote a Washington Post opinion piece that Kavanaugh should not be confirmed because he was not honest at the Senate hearing about the extent of his drinking.


    Kerry Berchem, also a classmate, said she’s made multiple submissions to an FBI tip line but has not received a return phone call or a substantive response.


    NBC reports that Berchem had attempted to get text messages to the FBI that showed the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim against Ramirez ahead of the New Yorker article.


    Julie Swetnick, who has alleged she was assaulted at a party attended by Kavanaugh and his friends, was never contacted by FBI investigators, according to high-profile attorney Michael Avenatti.


    Kavanaugh has called her accusations a “joke” and “categorically” denies the allegations.


    Elizabeth Rasor, Mark Judge’s former girlfriend, has said that Judge recounted to her how he and several Georgetown Prep classmates took turns having sex with an intoxicated woman in 1988, according to the New Yorker.


    Her lawyer say the FBI didn’t respond to Rasor’s request to be interviewed and Judge’s lawyers have strongly denied the account.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/4520376/b...s-interviewed/
    So again, if something relevant was deliberately missed or avoided, then this raises the issue of whether the FBI was similarly politically motivated under Obama. If not, what has changed? If so? Then Trump may have a valid point about their not pursuing Hillary Clinton.

    The reality we all know is that people are people; judges, police, FBI, you name it, they are all corruptible and never really beyond reproach. The system is supposed to limit the damage they can do. Where it doesn’t, there should be calls for improvement in the syste.

  60. #7160
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. That’s funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    I dislike her, I don't care what she does for a living, but she is such a has been in the industry, she's a saddo

  61. #7161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    The FBI interviewed 146 people, that's a lot. A democrat voted for Kavanaugh , the FBI must have done a thorough investigation

    That 146 number was over the course of 6 separate background checks. Not just the last one. The last FBI interviews were a farce. A political whitewash.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  62. #7162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. Thatís funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    Source please...
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  63. #7163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. Thatís funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    Source please...
    You know, I think that insult to Stormy sort of backfires a bit. After all, who was the one who was so eager to sleep with "horseface" before and then to cover it up?

  64. #7164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KC View Post
    So again, if something relevant was deliberately missed or avoided, then this raises the issue of whether the FBI was similarly politically motivated under Obama. If not, what has changed? If so? Then Trump may have a valid point about their not pursuing Hillary Clinton.

    The reality we all know is that people are people; judges, police, FBI, you name it, they are all corruptible and never really beyond reproach. The system is supposed to limit the damage they can do. Where it doesn’t, there should be calls for improvement in the syste.
    I guess you missed the part where Hillary Clinton WAS investigated by the FBI, specifically in regards to her e-mail and nothing criminal was found. And then the head of the FBI violated protocol and annonced that he was reopening the case just before the election, only to announce that it was about nothing days before the vote.

    yeah, the FBI really went out of their way to help her. Meanwhile, they were sitting on information about Trump and nary a peep before election day.

  65. #7165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by H.L. View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. That’s funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    I dislike her, I don't care what she does for a living, but she is such a has been in the industry, she's a saddo
    Right, if Trump was going to have sex with a porn star he'd at least pick one that was at the top of the charts. Fake news! Sad!

  66. #7166
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton area.
    Posts
    7,068

    Default

    Itís awful stuff. Iíve seen some of her porn and she is despicable. Who would want that after 1000s of others have been there, several at a time. Itís awful and DT should be very ashamed. She is a whore and he is too. Sickening. They both deserve to be whipped in the public square.
    Last edited by Drumbones; Today at 04:51 PM.

  67. #7167

  68. #7168

  69. #7169

  70. #7170
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. Thatís funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    Source please...
    You know, I think that insult to Stormy sort of backfires a bit. After all, who was the one who was so eager to sleep with "horseface" before and then to cover it up?

    Somehow, I dont think he cared about her face..

  71. #7171
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton area.
    Posts
    7,068

    Default

    ^^It seems old news but I hadnít heard it

  72. #7172
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Itís awful stuff. Iíve seen some of her porn and she is despicable. Who would want that after 1000s of others have been there, several at a time. Itís awful and DT should be very ashamed. She is a whore and he is too. Sickening. They both deserve to be whipped in the public square.

    ewww!

  73. #7173
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drumbones View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee. I gotta laugh at Trump calling Stormy Horseface. Thatís funny. See, he is not afraid to speak the truth. lol
    Source please...
    You know, I think that insult to Stormy sort of backfires a bit. After all, who was the one who was so eager to sleep with "horseface" before and then to cover it up?

    You missed that Dave..??

  74. #7174

  75. #7175

Page 72 of 72 FirstFirst ... 22626869707172

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •