Page 57 of 57 FirstFirst ... 7475354555657
Results 5,601 to 5,626 of 5626

Thread: Trump - misc

  1. #5601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spudly View Post

    Controversy: Melania Trump wore a jacket with the phrase, 'I REALLY DON'T CARE, DO U?' scrawled across the back when boarding a plane to visit immigrant children in Texas

    Last edited by Edmonton PRT; Today at 02:04 PM.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  2. #5602
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  3. #5603

    Default

    That cover is actually really adorable.

    It looks like President Trump is coming to personally help that crying girl himself!

  4. #5604

    Default

    nope. Looking at a crying child like an alien without extending his arms. He is clueless how to stop or comfort a motherless child...
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  5. #5605
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    4,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrOilers View Post
    That cover is actually really adorable.

    It looks like President Trump is coming to personally help that crying girl himself!

    He is very good with his grandchildren, there were lots of photos before he became President ..

    What was the guys name who came up with the idea of separating children over 5? Williams..?

  6. #5606

    Default

    I see That the Liberals are still suffering from deep-seeded psychosis
    Last edited by Creativemind; Today at 04:11 PM.

  7. #5607

    Default

    And you are still drinking the cult purple Kool Aid...
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  8. #5608

    Default

    Trump administration asks Pentagon to prepare 20,000 beds for immigrant children on military bases
    The request comes amid heightened scrutiny of President Donald Trump's immigration policies that have separated some 2,500 children from their parents at the border
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8410946.html
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  9. #5609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrOilers View Post
    That cover is actually really adorable.

    It looks like President Trump is coming to personally help that crying girl himself!
    Actually, he's wondering if she's too old for Roy Moore to date.

    Or if he can shoot her on Fifth Avenue and get away with it.
    Last edited by kkozoriz; Today at 04:17 PM.

  10. #5610

    Default

    More deep-seeded psychosis


  11. #5611

    Default

    Peter fonda with 13 year old Brook Sheilds while doing a movie about a pedophile (FONDA) who wins her in a poker game and they declare their love for each other .

  12. #5612

    Default

    What about Trump and his dreams of incest?


    In the almost 20 years since, Mr Trump has called his eldest daughter “voluptuous”. He’s said it’s OK to describe her as “a piece of ***”, though she is a senior executive in his business empire. And he’s said that, if she wasn’t his daughter, “perhaps [he’d] be dating her”.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a7353876.html

  13. #5613

    Default

    And Peter Fonda has apologized for his horrible tweet about Barron Trump, who should have been totally off limits.


    “I tweeted something highly inappropriate and vulgar about the president and his family in response to the devastating images I was seeing on television,” Fonda said in a statement to USA Today. “Like many Americans, I am very impassioned and distraught over the situation with children separated from their families at the border, but I went way too far. It was wrong and I should not have done it. I immediately regretted it and sincerely apologize to the family for what I said and any hurt my words have caused.”

    https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...b0040e273fba5a
    When is Trump going to apologize for the child separations? Oh right, never because it was never intended do do that. Really.

    Jeff Sessions Says He Never 'Intended' To Separate Immigrant Families. That's A Lie.

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Thursday that the Trump administration “never really intended” to separate immigrant families on the border, a claim that is contradicted by an assertion that he and other officials have made in the past.


    In an interview with Christian Broadcasting Network that is set to air Friday, Sessions agreed that thousands of children ― some just months old ― being torn from their parents’ arms as a result of his new “zero tolerance” immigration policy didn’t make for great optics for the Trump administration.


    “It hasn’t been good, and the American people don’t like the idea that we are separating families. We never really intended to do that,” Sessions said.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/...b00295f15aac52

  14. #5614

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    What about Trump and his dreams of incest?


    In the almost 20 years since, Mr Trump has called his eldest daughter “voluptuous”. He’s said it’s OK to describe her as “a piece of ***”, though she is a senior executive in his business empire. And he’s said that, if she wasn’t his daughter, “perhaps [he’d] be dating her”.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a7353876.html
    Dreams of incest are you insane seriously ? Only a Projecting liberal would think a father daughter pic was incest .

  15. #5615

    Default

    Talking about "dating" his daughter? What do you think that means, tiddly-winks by the fire? How about agreeing that she is a "piece of ***"?

    Apparently the Cambridge dictionary is projecting as well.

    piece of ***
    us offensive

    used to refer to a woman as a sexually attractive object

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...h/piece-of-***
    Or this

    piece of ***
    adjective
    The definition of a piece of *** is a person who is considered to have value or worth only for sexual reasons.
    A girl you want to become sexually involved with but not have a relationship with might be described as a piece of ***.




    "piece-of-***." YourDictionary, n.d. Web. 21 June 2018. <http://www.yourdictionary.com/piece-of-***>.


    APA Style


    piece-of-***
    Noun
    (plural pieces of ***)


    (US, idiomatic, colloquial, vulgar) An act of intercourse, especially a one night stand.
    (US, idiomatic, colloquial, vulgar) A very attractive woman, when considered as a sex object.

    http://www.yourdictionary.com/piece-of-***

  16. #5616

    Default

    Meanwhile, Trump killed a program that was working extraordinarily well, supposedly to save $12 million, which is money the government finds in the sofa cushions.

    1 year ago, Trump got rid of a wildly successful immigration program that didn’t lock people up
    The Trump administration is pretending it didn't have a choice to separate families.

    The reasons Trump staff gave for ending ICE’s Family Case Management Program (FCMP) pilot barely a year after it launched expose, again, the administration’s serial lying about the motives undergirding its deportation campaign. That program served roughly the same population currently targeted by Trump’s zero-tolerance policy: Adults with children who claim asylum but enter the country in between official U.S. ports.


    Even though FCMP was delivering a higher compliance rate than other “alternatives to detention” (ATD) systems like ankle monitors and random house visits, and doing so at a fraction of the cost of keeping people locked up pending trial, Trump’s ICE leaders pulled the plug.


    The reason? Too many families turned out to have legitimate arguments for obtaining legal status in the U.S. Though Trump and his loyal GOP colleagues now insist family detention is necessary because people won’t show up for court otherwise, the FCMP was delivering near-perfect compliance from immigrant families – it just wasn’t getting enough of them deported.


    “Since the inception of FCMP, there have only been 15 removals from this program, as opposed to more than 2,200 from ATD,” ICE spokeswoman Sarah Rodriguez said in June 2017. “By discontinuing FCMP, ICE will save more than $12 million a year — money which can be utilized for other programs which more effectively allow ICE to discharge its enforcement and removal responsibilities.

    https://thinkprogress.org/trump-ende...-bd506068c05c/

  17. #5617

    Default

    And Peter FONDLER only apologised because Sony pictures reprimanded him and he has a movie about to be released. And CBC deep- seeded psychosis good thing is secret service are taking these unstable people serious now

    v

  18. #5618

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Meanwhile, Trump killed a program that was working extraordinarily well, supposedly to save $12 million, which is money the government finds in the sofa cushions.

    1 year ago, Trump got rid of a wildly successful immigration program that didn’t lock people up
    The Trump administration is pretending it didn't have a choice to separate families.

    The reasons Trump staff gave for ending ICE’s Family Case Management Program (FCMP) pilot barely a year after it launched expose, again, the administration’s serial lying about the motives undergirding its deportation campaign. That program served roughly the same population currently targeted by Trump’s zero-tolerance policy: Adults with children who claim asylum but enter the country in between official U.S. ports.


    Even though FCMP was delivering a higher compliance rate than other “alternatives to detention” (ATD) systems like ankle monitors and random house visits, and doing so at a fraction of the cost of keeping people locked up pending trial, Trump’s ICE leaders pulled the plug.


    The reason? Too many families turned out to have legitimate arguments for obtaining legal status in the U.S. Though Trump and his loyal GOP colleagues now insist family detention is necessary because people won’t show up for court otherwise, the FCMP was delivering near-perfect compliance from immigrant families – it just wasn’t getting enough of them deported.


    “Since the inception of FCMP, there have only been 15 removals from this program, as opposed to more than 2,200 from ATD,” ICE spokeswoman Sarah Rodriguez said in June 2017. “By discontinuing FCMP, ICE will save more than $12 million a year — money which can be utilized for other programs which more effectively allow ICE to discharge its enforcement and removal responsibilities.

    https://thinkprogress.org/trump-ende...-bd506068c05c/
    You missed the important part how wildly successful the Obama era program was...

    Homan was likely invoking the near-identical rates at which people in each program showed up in immigration court: 99.6% for the ankle-monitored crowd, and 100% for those paired with caseworkers. But either way the programs prove that Trump and his pals – even the ones who acted scandalized about family separation but then showed up to carry water for the president Wednesday as he prepared his strategic-retreat Executive Order – know full well that migrants can be released on their own recognizance without ghosting on the feds.
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  19. #5619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creativemind View Post
    Peter fonda with 13 year old Brook Sheilds while doing a movie about a pedophile (FONDA) who wins her in a poker game and they declare their love for each other .
    Obviously you can't tell the difference between reality; and a movie script and staged publicity photoshoot.

    Do you have any credible source that Peter Fonda had any improper or illegal motives with his co-star? If not, STFU
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  20. #5620

    Default

    Let's hope that Trump doesn't hear about this. Considering how quickly he picked up on Ann Coulter's claim that the kids were "crisis actors", it wouldn't surprise me.

    Oregon DMV suspends employee who encouraged shooting immigrants at the border to save ‘billions’ of tax dollars

    In response to a post about how Trump has handled the migrant crisis, McAllen said that the children should be shot to save tax dollars.


    “I personally think they should shoot them all at the border and call it good,” she wrote in screenshots circulated on Twitter. “It’ll save us hard working AMERICAN’S billions of dollars on our taxes!!

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/06/ore...s-tax-dollars/

  21. #5621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Creativemind View Post
    Peter fonda with 13 year old Brook Sheilds while doing a movie about a pedophile (FONDA) who wins her in a poker game and they declare their love for each other .
    Obviously you can't tell the difference between reality; and a movie script and staged publicity photoshoot.

    Do you have any credible source that Peter Fonda had any improper or illegal motives with his co-star? If not, STFU
    Trump is an actor too if you count Playboy soft porn movies as "acting".

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2818929

  22. #5622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkozoriz View Post
    Trump is an actor too if you count Playboy soft porn movies as "acting".

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2818929
    They dd not use Trump in any Playboy movie porn shots because High Definition had not been invented yet so nothing could be seen in test shots... LOL
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  23. #5623

    Default

    Just to get off Trump for a moment this video infuriates me

    https://twitter.com/falcoariana/stat...84986717122561

  24. #5624

    Default

    Why are you bring up this disturbing video on a Trump thread?
    Advocating a better Edmonton through effective, efficient and economical transit.

  25. #5625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenco View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rupikhalon001 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    My response in bold


    Quote Originally Posted by rupikhalon001 View Post
    Perhaps people do not realize the following

    1. Kids of parents who both go to jail in the US and Canada are separated. Claiming refugee status is not a crime
    Entering a country at a place other than a designated point of entry is in fact a crime. Almost every country on the planet has rules about where you enter the country


    2. These 'camps' existed long before Trump under heaven forbid, even Obama ( Cannot believe what Laura Bush said... has she lost her mind) That was for unattended children. Not children forcibly separated from their parents
    Would you rather have the children detained in adult detention centres ???? Or in a place where they are fed, watered, looked after, provided medical care and education ?

    3. If these families presented themselves at a port of entry, they would be processed "normally" "Contrary to what (Homeland Security) has indicated as proper procedure, we are currently seeing cases where immigrant families seeking asylum are separated after lawfully presenting themselves at a U.S. port of entry." Source

    4. To be completely honest, these parents are placing their kids in mortal danger by trying to cross deserts and enter the US illegally. In fact, they should also be charged with 'failing to provide the necessities of life' and child endangerment. It is far more complex than that. Many are traveling with uncles, cousins, family friends. Some have had to leave their home countries after their parents were arrested there. You obviously don't understand the plight of refugees
    That just adds to the whole ugly situation, now you are saying that in fact these kids may not be with their legal guardians, please do tell how you expect the US authorities to figure this whole mess out ? Just wave the kids through along with the adults who may or may not be family ?


    5. If certain members of congress are so wound about this, pass a law that prevents the separation of families. This was a Trump/Sessions policy change. No laws changed to create this zero tolerance policy. Trump could stop this with a phone call but he wants to get his wall by using children as hostages.

    Children wont be sent to jail along with their parents, as it's their guardians who broke the law, and crossed the desert.

    6. It's sure looking like a wall would solve a lot of these issues by preventing people from crossing into the US illegally. Nope. The wall will have gaps and people will tunnel under or get in by other means including by boat.

    Not a chance, the vast majority would not take such a risk if a wall was in place. A wall WILL stop the vast majority.

    7. If the US is such a terrible country, why on earth are people still willing to risk their life ( and their children's lives) to get there. Because they are leaving life threatening conditions that are far worse. You really don't get how desperate they are and how well you have it. You are a simpleton.

    Ah, name calling... I have freedom of expression and wont be shouted down to or intimidated by name calling. It's not the United States fault that these people are not claiming refugee status in all of the other countries on their way to the US. Odd how they never travel south.

    The bias the media has for the Democrats is evident, unbelievable and revolting. I cannot even watch CNN anymore. Even reading CBC's Neil MacDonald is enough... Next we are going to be subjected to 'Canada separates kids'.. Let's just close the jails and tell the police not to enforce any laws. No, you are unbelievably revolting

    Name calling... wonderful. The problem is really stemming from the fact that the US was lax enforcing it's immigration policy for years. Now people are all upset that Trump is enforcing the policy. It's easy to do nothing, Trump said he was going to enforce the border and that is what he is doing.

    my oh my.. how this whole thread has gone down the tubes..., Nazi's, concentration camps, jews…

    First off, comparing the detention camps to concentration camps is a downright disgrace to the 6 million people slaughtered in the concentration camps.

    What are the options here ?
    1. Leave anybody with kids though the border ?
    2. Send the adults home, leave the kids stay in the US ?
    3. Open the borders to everyone ?
    4. Build a wall and deter illegal immigration ?

    How many of these people will now be crossing into Quebec at Roxham Road ??? It's only a matter of time before we hear about our 'concentration camps' in Quebec.
    So you think the Trudeau government will separate the children from their parents?
    Happens everyday in courtooms across Canada and Usa when people break the law and are incarcerated ! So why should people who are not even American or Canadian citizens break the law entering into a country illegal get special treament over them ? And yes Trudeau does seperate them daily from their parents .

  26. #5626
    Becoming a C2E Power Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creativemind View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenco View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rupikhalon001 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Edmonton PRT View Post
    My response in bold


    Quote Originally Posted by rupikhalon001 View Post
    Perhaps people do not realize the following

    1. Kids of parents who both go to jail in the US and Canada are separated. Claiming refugee status is not a crime
    Entering a country at a place other than a designated point of entry is in fact a crime. Almost every country on the planet has rules about where you enter the country


    2. These 'camps' existed long before Trump under heaven forbid, even Obama ( Cannot believe what Laura Bush said... has she lost her mind) That was for unattended children. Not children forcibly separated from their parents
    Would you rather have the children detained in adult detention centres ???? Or in a place where they are fed, watered, looked after, provided medical care and education ?

    3. If these families presented themselves at a port of entry, they would be processed "normally" "Contrary to what (Homeland Security) has indicated as proper procedure, we are currently seeing cases where immigrant families seeking asylum are separated after lawfully presenting themselves at a U.S. port of entry." Source

    4. To be completely honest, these parents are placing their kids in mortal danger by trying to cross deserts and enter the US illegally. In fact, they should also be charged with 'failing to provide the necessities of life' and child endangerment. It is far more complex than that. Many are traveling with uncles, cousins, family friends. Some have had to leave their home countries after their parents were arrested there. You obviously don't understand the plight of refugees
    That just adds to the whole ugly situation, now you are saying that in fact these kids may not be with their legal guardians, please do tell how you expect the US authorities to figure this whole mess out ? Just wave the kids through along with the adults who may or may not be family ?


    5. If certain members of congress are so wound about this, pass a law that prevents the separation of families. This was a Trump/Sessions policy change. No laws changed to create this zero tolerance policy. Trump could stop this with a phone call but he wants to get his wall by using children as hostages.

    Children wont be sent to jail along with their parents, as it's their guardians who broke the law, and crossed the desert.

    6. It's sure looking like a wall would solve a lot of these issues by preventing people from crossing into the US illegally. Nope. The wall will have gaps and people will tunnel under or get in by other means including by boat.

    Not a chance, the vast majority would not take such a risk if a wall was in place. A wall WILL stop the vast majority.

    7. If the US is such a terrible country, why on earth are people still willing to risk their life ( and their children's lives) to get there. Because they are leaving life threatening conditions that are far worse. You really don't get how desperate they are and how well you have it. You are a simpleton.

    Ah, name calling... I have freedom of expression and wont be shouted down to or intimidated by name calling. It's not the United States fault that these people are not claiming refugee status in all of the other countries on their way to the US. Odd how they never travel south.

    The bias the media has for the Democrats is evident, unbelievable and revolting. I cannot even watch CNN anymore. Even reading CBC's Neil MacDonald is enough... Next we are going to be subjected to 'Canada separates kids'.. Let's just close the jails and tell the police not to enforce any laws. No, you are unbelievably revolting

    Name calling... wonderful. The problem is really stemming from the fact that the US was lax enforcing it's immigration policy for years. Now people are all upset that Trump is enforcing the policy. It's easy to do nothing, Trump said he was going to enforce the border and that is what he is doing.

    my oh my.. how this whole thread has gone down the tubes..., Nazi's, concentration camps, jews…

    First off, comparing the detention camps to concentration camps is a downright disgrace to the 6 million people slaughtered in the concentration camps.

    What are the options here ?
    1. Leave anybody with kids though the border ?
    2. Send the adults home, leave the kids stay in the US ?
    3. Open the borders to everyone ?
    4. Build a wall and deter illegal immigration ?

    How many of these people will now be crossing into Quebec at Roxham Road ??? It's only a matter of time before we hear about our 'concentration camps' in Quebec.
    So you think the Trudeau government will separate the children from their parents?
    Happens everyday in courtooms across Canada and Usa when people break the law and are incarcerated ! So why should people who are not even American or Canadian citizens break the law entering into a country illegal get special treament over them ? And yes Trudeau does seperate them daily from their parents .
    you have to see what the end goal here is. First off, people are coming into the country illegally.
    The adults with whom the kids are entering the country may or may not be the parents.
    The adults are charged with a crime, the kids are not charged along with the adults - as they are minors.
    Separating the kids from the adults ( who may or may not be the parents) while the adults are charged and go through the process.

    Now, due to the 'outrage', the children are going to be held with the adults.
    In the US there is a law that says that these minors cannot be held for more than 20 days ( sorry, do not have the source)
    Now you have a situation, President Trump signed an order saying the kids cannot be separated from the adults, even though the adults can be held longer and the kids can only be held for 20 days.

    Now you have a very interesting legal situation, which is going to result in some sort of case where a judge is going to say this is cruel and unusual treatment and order the release of illegal adults with kids after a specified number of days.
    They will invariably get a court date in which to appear in front of a judge to have their case heard.

    How many of these people will actually show up at their immigration hearing ????????????

    Am I missing something here, would a wall not prevent all of the above issues ?

    Why are these refugees not claiming refugee status in Mexico ? Once you refuse to claim asylum in the first safe country, you are no longer a true refugee, you are acting outside the bounds of international refugee protection.

Page 57 of 57 FirstFirst ... 7475354555657

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •