Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 1,101 to 1,108 of 1108

Thread: The TRUTH about climate change

  1. #1101

    Default

    [QUOTE=MrCombust;909271]
    Quote Originally Posted by OffWhyte View Post
    Here's a list of 125 errors in the Monckton "research" paper:http://www.altenergyaction.org/Monckton.html
    ahhh this disagrees with everything I've said, no point reading this past E1


    FTFY

  2. #1102

    Default



    What caused the acceleration in global warming in 1690-1740?

  3. #1103

    Default The TRUTH. The obvious fudging of the land based temperature record.

    Ladies and gentlemen of Alberta. Temperature records of the past are created using different methods. Proxy records use indicators other than modern instruments to determine the temperature. Instrument records (thermometers) have been used by the US, Britain, and other countries (depending on development) since the 1800's. GISS, NOAA and Hadcrut are land based thermometer readings, or ship based ocean readings of temperature that go back to the 1800's. Radiosonde, UAH, and RSS are atmospheric readings that go back about 40 years.

    Radiosonde, UAH, and RSS show no significant warming in the last 20 years, and increasingly even the 40 year trend is coming into question.

    Climate advocacy at NASA, NOAA, Hadcrut, has given the keepers of the temperature records the leniency to fudge the data to fit the global warming theory. They present a picture of of a worldwide, smooth, exponential, warming curve that correlates well with CO2. But this close match is collusion and fraud. The dust bowl of the 1930's has been erased, record high temperatures are recorded all over the world where there is no data, the 1970's cooling has been erased, the early 1900's records have been lowered. And with all that fudging, 5 independent records from NOAA, NASA, Hadcrut, and others are shown to be identical, an irrefutable indication of collusion.

    Tony Heller explains the fudging and collusion of the land based records in this video. Tony uses past versions of GISS, Hadcrut, newspaper clippings, and other records to show the 1930's warming was real, and has been erased from the temperature record. You can argue about the validity of the fudging of the data, but with past records (still) available on the internet, you cannot argue the records aren't being fudged.

    Watch this comprehensive video on the comprehensive fudging, and misrepresentation of the land based temperature records..............

    Last edited by MrCombust; 06-11-2018 at 07:14 PM.
    "Without feedbacks, a doubling of CO2 would result in 1 C global warming, which is undisputed." Climate sensitivity, Wikipedia

  4. #1104

    Default The TRUTH. Exactly where does "climate science" come from?

    One source of "climate science" is the IPCC. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This was formed by the UN to summarize all the published climate science to produce a cohesive summary report for nations of the world. The IPCC has many scientists working on technical reports, followed by a summary report by, and for, policy makers.

    But the IPCC went a little berserk, instead of "summarizing" science, they became eco-climate activists. Instead of "summarizing" the science, the policy makers began to dictate the science. Here's a report from the IPCC explaining why 16 pages of changes to the technical report had to be made to fit the policy report. That's changes to the science reports to fit the policy reports.........................

    "Changes to the Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment to ensure consistency with the approved Summary for Policymakers"

    http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_...ckle_backs.pdf

    So the next time CBC says we gotta reduce our carbon footprint, ask them....... according to the science, or the IPCC policymakers?
    Last edited by MrCombust; 10-11-2018 at 03:32 PM.
    "Without feedbacks, a doubling of CO2 would result in 1 C global warming, which is undisputed." Climate sensitivity, Wikipedia

  5. #1105

    Default The TRUTH. The climate change gravy train.......

    It's always comical when the climate advocates slander some guy because he sat in the same restaurant with an Exxon employee. They pretend climate denial is based on big money from the fossil fuel corporations. Nothing, NOTHING compares to the ocean of money, glory, fame, and adulation of climate advocacy. Who doesn't love somebody trying to "save the planet"?

    Watch this video on the massive money stream to keep the climate change agenda alive.

    Look who's making the REAL money.........

    "Follow the Money" by Marc Morano.

    "Without feedbacks, a doubling of CO2 would result in 1 C global warming, which is undisputed." Climate sensitivity, Wikipedia

  6. #1106

    Default The TRUTH. No end in sight to the 30 year cooling trend!



    What cooling trend? Where'd it go?


    "Without feedbacks, a doubling of CO2 would result in 1 C global warming, which is undisputed." Climate sensitivity, Wikipedia

  7. #1107
    Addicted to C2E
    Mr. Reality Check

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    11,912

    Default

    ^^

    mark morano?

    really???

    this mark morano:

    MarcMorano is the real-world fossil fuel industry version of Nick Naylor. His career began working for Rush Limbaugh, followed by a job at Cybercast News Service where he launched the Swift Boat attacks on 2004 Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. In 2006, Morano became the director of communications for Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK), who is perhaps best known for throwing a snowball on the Senate floor and calling human-caused global warming “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.”

    Thus it’s unsurprising that in 2009, Morano began directing fossil fuel funded think-tanks designed to cast doubt on the reality of and dangers associated with human-caused global warming. As he admitted in Merchants of Doubt, Morano frequently embodies the strategy of climate denial known as ‘fake experts’…


    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...-million-users

    that mark morano?
    "If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee

  8. #1108
    C2E Continued Contributor
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    I don't even know anymore :/
    Posts
    1,196

    Default

    If you actually follow the money, you realize the trail leads to people like him. Because there's a whole lot more money in the oil industry than in the "climate change industry" or whatever.

Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •